Connect with us

Business

TV station owners reinstate Jimmy Kimmel show after ban

Published

on

Read full article on post.

16 minutes ago

Sakshi Venkatraman and

Aleks Phillips

imageGetty Images

Jimmy Kimmel Live! will now appear again across the US, after two of America’s largest local TV station owners said they would resume showing the programme.

Sinclair and Nexstar – which own dozens of stations affiliated with national broadcaster ABC – had taken the show off air for more than a week over comments Kimmel made about the recent killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk.

Both announced it would be reinstated on Friday after ABC itself brought the late-night talk show back following a brief suspension over his comments.

The decision shows the power and influence national networks and local station owners have over one another.

While networks rely on local stations airing their shows for advertising revenue, local stations count on networks producing popular shows that will draw in an audience.

Kimmel’s return show saw his audience more than quadruple – despite about a quarter of ABC stations not airing it as the Nexstar and Sinclair ban continued.

Sinclair said it had decided to reinstate the talk show after “thoughtful feedback from viewers, advertisers and community leaders”.

It wrote in a press release that its discussions with ABC and parent company Disney were “ongoing and constructive”. The media conglomerate said it had suggested measures to promote “accountability” within Disney – though none of these have yed been adopted.

Nexstar also cited positive discussions with ABC, saying it appreciated the network’s “constructive approach to addressing our concerns”. The company said it was “committed to protecting the First Amendment”.

Kimmel sparked controversy by appearing to suggest the person who fatally shot Kirk, 31, at a university campus event in Utah earlier this month as a supporter of Donald Trump.

He said the US president and his allies were “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them” and trying to “score political points from it”.

He also likened Trump’s reaction to the conservative firebrand’s murder to “how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish”.

Sinclair and Nexstar pulled the show after the Trump-appointed chair of America’s broadcast watchdog threatened to revoke ABC’s licence – prompting the network to suspend Kimmel and triggering a fierce debate about free speech.

By lifting the ban, Sinclair and Nexstar viewers in cities like Washington DC, Nashville, New Orleans and Seattle will now be able to watch Kimmel’s show again.

Kimmel returned to air on Tuesday, expressing regret about his earlier remarks while hitting out at the Trump administration in a 28-minute monologue.

“It was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man,” he said.

But he criticised “anti-American” threats to free speech, accusing the Trump administration of “mob tactics”.

“Our leader celebrates people losing their livelihoods because he can’t take a joke,” the talk show host added.

Trump was openly disappointed in Kimmel’s reinstatement.

“I can’t believe ABC Fake News gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back,” he wrote in a social media post.

Business

If you can’t vote in next month’s presidential election, we want to hear from you

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

image

ARE YOU AN Irish emigrant abroad who can’t vote in next month’s presidential election?

Maybe you are a British, EU or non-EU citizen living in the Republic who does not have the right to vote in presidential elections?

Or perhaps you are an Irish citizen living in Northern Ireland? Although it’s long been talked about, the right to vote for the president has never been granted to people in the North.

Advertisement

If you fall into any of these groups, we’d love to hear from you.

We’ll be reflecting your views on next month’s election in a forthcoming article. We’d like to find out:

  • Would you like to have the right to vote for the president?
  • Does it bother you that you can’t vote in this election, or do you think it’s fair enough?
  • Who might you vote for if you could?

Please share your thoughts by emailing a paragraph or two (around 200-250 words max) to answers@thejournal.ie.

Please include your name, where you’re from and where you’re living now, and let us know if you’d prefer to remain anonymous.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Continue Reading

Business

Autism campaigner: Autism is not new and does not need to be cured

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

image

WHEN DEPUTY DANNY Healy-Rae stood up in the Dáil last week and said that Autism “wasn’t an issue in my day” and that “there were very few in my day”, I felt a familiar pang.

I’ve heard variations of this claim my whole life; the idea that Autistic people are somehow a new problem for society.

Danny Healy-Rae also suggested that vitamin deficiencies might be a cause of Autism. Now, with US President Donald Trump and his Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. repeating the myth that paracetamol causes Autism, misinformation is coming from both sides of the Atlantic.

These narratives are not just wrong; they are deeply damaging.

Autism is not a new discovery

Autism is not a 21st-century invention. Long before paracetamol, Tylenol, or modern diagnostic manuals, observers described people with behaviours and sensory sensitivities that map onto what we now recognise as Autism. Scholars believe figures like Michelangelo, Sir Isaac Newton, and Albert Einstein may have been Autistic. In France in the 1800s, Victor of Aveyron, sometimes called “the wild boy of Aveyron”, showed behaviours we would now recognise as Autistic traits.

Soviet psychiatrist Grunya Sukhareva published detailed case studies of children with narrow interests and social difficulties in 1925, almost two decades before the word “Autism” entered mainstream psychiatric literature.

These are not curiosities; they are evidence that Autistic ways of being have always existed.

The truth is, Autistic people were there in Danny Healy-Rae’s day; we just weren’t seen. Many were kept at home, institutionalised, or pushed to the margins of society. If you think back to your own classroom, you probably remember a child who kept to themselves or was written off as “odd”. That child may have been Autistic.

Many people are only being identified now because diagnostic criteria, awareness, and reduced stigma mean that parents and adults are more willing to seek help for their children or themselves.

Girls and women have been under-recognised because they mask, learning social scripts to blend in. Research documents this “female camouflage” effect and its role in later or missed diagnoses. Masking isn’t harmless; it has real costs for mental health and well-being. Autistic burnout often mimics depression.

Calls for a ‘cure’

For Autistic people, the endless chatter about a cause or cure is deeply distressing. It frames our existence as a problem rather than a way of being human.

As a child, I banged my head off walls to regulate myself. As a teenager, I hurt myself to cope. My mother could not take me anywhere that was bright or noisy. Those struggles haven’t vanished; I learned to manage, and my meltdowns happen behind closed doors. That is what being Autistic can look like.

Language matters. When leaders speak of Autistic people as something that must be explained away, they reduce our lives to statistics or pathology. That rhetoric fuels stigma and prioritises “fixing” over supporting.

For many Autistic people, the goal is not to be cured, but to be accepted, accommodated, and resourced.
Advertisement

The world should be changed to include us, not the other way round.

Attempts to pinpoint a cause

Trump and RFK Jr. claimed this week that the most common painkiller used in pregnancy causes Autism. It is right to scrutinise any potential risk to pregnant people and babies, but science must follow evidence, and large, well-designed studies that control for family and genetic factors have found no causal link.

A major Swedish population study that initially found small associations with paracetamol used sibling comparisons, but when they compared siblings, they found that both the one exposed to paracetamol and the one not exposed could be Autistic at similar rates. That showed the small link they saw at first wasn’t caused by the medicine itself; it was due to other shared family or genetic factors.

Worse than the scientific uncertainty is how claims about “causes” are weaponised.

Andrew Wakefield’s infamous 1998 paper linking the MMR vaccine to Autism was later retracted as fraudulent, but not before it caused panic, plummeting vaccination rates, and cast Autistic people as the “cost” of immunisation.

Nearly 30 years later, this myth still circulates widely online. Wakefield had financial motives, profiting from undermining the combined MMR with his own vaccine. His fraud was both dangerous and lucrative.

So when I hear Trump and RFK Jr. pushing paracetamol as the supposed cause, I can’t help but ask, what “cure” will follow? Who will swoop in with a “safe alternative”, a supplement, a miracle therapy? Who is lining their pockets while families are whipped into fear, and Autistic people are treated as broken? Who benefits from you believing this?

We need supports, not stigma

Autism is a lifelong neuro-developmental difference shaped by complex genetic and environmental factors, and it is part of human diversity. The World Health Organisation and major research bodies make this clear.

Autism exists, but services don’t. Across Ireland, families are waiting years for assessment. Children are being left without school places or forced to travel hours for appropriate education.

Perhaps it is time we turned the lens around.

Our brains, like our appearances, are diverse. Autism and ADHD are not rare pathologies but part of the natural spectrum of humanity. I explain it to my kids like this: “You are an iPhone, and I’m an Android. We just run on different operating systems.” Neither is broken, neither needs curing; they just work differently.

Autism is also not a straight line from “mild” to “severe.” It is more like a pie chart, with slices representing communication, sensory needs, executive function, and more.

I also live with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, and research shows that conditions like EDS and hypermobility often overlap with neurodivergence, including Autism and ADHD. That shows how complex human biology is, and how wrong it is to look for a single “cause” of Autism. We are messy, diverse beings, and Autism is part of that natural complexity, not a mysterious illness.

What is truly distressing is the constant view of Autistic people as a problem to be solved, something to be prevented or cured. We are not broken. We are part of human diversity. Until people in power understand that, families like mine will keep being failed.

Evie Nevin has a degree in journalism. She is an Autistic mother of two, actor, advocate for neurodivergent and disabled people, public speaker, and political campaigner based in West Cork.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Continue Reading

Business

Brown Thomas hits targets with paper bag charge

Published

on

Read more on post.

Just a bit more than a year ago, department store Brown Thomas began charging customers 60 cent for branded paper carrier bags.

There was much gnashing of teeth, with some customers irked by being asked at the till to pay for a branded paper bag to carry home their purchases after potentially spending hundreds of euro in store.

Brown Thomas said the move was designed to promote sustainability and reduce the number of bags it handed over the counter.

It also said the profits from the bag initiative would be used to fund a scheme to plant 100,000 trees here over the next 10 years in partnership with Crann, a voluntary organisation promoting hedgerows and woodlands.

A year on, how has the initiative gone?

“It has achieved all of the sustainability goals,” Donald McDonald, the retailer’s chief executive told The Irish Times. “We’ve planted the 10,000 trees, and we’ve reduced bag consumption by close to 40 per cent.”

What has been the reaction of customers over that time?

Brown Thomas defends decision to charge customers 60 cent for paper bagsOpens in new window ]

“There’s little or no noise from customers. That’s not to say that there’s none, but last month it was fewer than five complaints. There are people who don’t agree with the principle.

“But we believe there’s an environmental cost to the bag itself and the whole thing was to change customer behaviours around bags. It has achieved what we wanted to achieve.”

Other Irish retailers are also charging for paper bags, though it’s not clear if any of them are diverting the funds for green initiatives.

Worth noting, too, that the Selfridges department store in the UK, which is part of the same group as Brown Thomas, does not charge for paper bags.

“Every business makes its own decisions,” McDonald said diplomatically.

Based on the results to date, it would appear that Brown Thomas hasn’t made a bags of customer relations with the charge.

Continue Reading

Trending