Connect with us

Business

Trump is racist and sexist, London Mayor Sadiq Khan says

Published

on

Read more on post.

15 minutes ago

Tony Grew

Sir Sadiq Khan has said Donald Trump has shown he is “racist, sexist, misogynistic and Islamophobic” after the president made comments about him to the United Nations.

Speaking to the UN General Assembly in New York on Tuesday, Trump said London had “a terrible, terrible mayor, and it’s been changed, it’s been so changed”.

He added: “Now they want to go to Sharia law.”

Speaking to BBC London, Sir Sadiq said: “People are wondering what it is about this Muslim mayor who leads a liberal, multi-cultural, progressive and successful city, that means I appear to be living rent-free inside Donald Trump’s head.”

He added: “I think President Trump has shown he is racist, he is sexist, he is misogynistic and he is Islamophobic.”

“When people say things, when people act in a certain way, when people behave in a certain way, you’ve got to believe them,” he said.

Responding to the president calling him a “terrible mayor”, he said he was “thankful we have record numbers of Americans coming to London”.

He added that different criteria showed London was “often the number one city on the globe when it comes to culture”.

The White House has been approached for comment.

imageEPA President Trump stands at the podium in the UN assembly hall in New York. The hall has a green carpet and green marble fittings. The president is wearing a blue suit and a red tie.EPA

Cabinet minister Pat McFadden defended Sir Sadiq on Wednesday.

He said the London mayor and US president “have had a beef for some years” and rejected the claim that London wanted to “go to” Sharia law.

He said British law and “no other kind of law” applied in the UK.

Earlier this month, justice minister Sarah Sackman told the House of Commons Sharia law formed “no part of the law of England and Wales”.

While religious courts, including Sharia councils, do operate in the UK, most of their work deals with religious marriage arbitration and financial matters. The government has been clear that their rulings are not legally binding.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said that with President Trump, people should “never take what he says literally, ever, on anything, but always take everything he says seriously”.

Speaking during an LBC phone-in, he added: “So is he right to say that Sharia is an issue in London? Yes.

“Is it an overwhelming issue at this stage? No.

“Has the mayor of London directly linked himself to it? No.”

He added: “I think what Trump was aiming at with his big pitch that the West (is) going to hell is it’s in danger of losing its culture, its heritage, its identity.”

Sackman previously told Parliament: “Where people choose to put themselves before those councils, in common with Christian, Jewish and other courts of faith, that is part of religious tolerance which is an important British value.”

The Church of England’s ecclesiastical courts have jurisdiction over some aspects of church property and criminal conduct by clergy while Jewish religious tribunals, known as Beth Din, are a voluntary religious tribunal where individuals can resolve disputes based on Jewish law.

The Roman Catholic Church operates tribunals that consider spiritual issues and marriage annulments.

imagePA Media

This is not the first time the United States’ leader has attacked Sir Sadiq.

In 2019 he called London’s mayor, who was re-elected for a third term in 2024, a “stone cold loser”.

In the past Trump has challenged Sir Sadiq to an IQ test and been critical of his response to the London Bridge attack in 2017.

In July, during a visit to Scotland, the president called Sir Sadiq “a nasty person” who had “done a terrible job”.

Sitting beside the president, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer intervened when Trump condemned Sir Sadiq, saying: “He’s a friend of mine, actually.”

Earlier this month, President Trump said he “didn’t want” Sir Sadiq at the state banquet hosted by the King at Windsor Castle.

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One heading back to the US after the state visit, Trump described him as “among the worst mayors in the world”.

Sir Sadiq did not attend the state banquet and the BBC understands he did not seek or expect an invitation.

More on this story
Related Internet Links

Breaking News

Mums stopped from seeing dying teens, riot trial told

Published

on

Read more on post.

The mothers of two dying teens were stopped by police from seeing their sons’ bodies before violence erupted, a trial has been told.

Eight people have gone on trial accused of rioting which caused “mayhem” and “carnage” in Ely, Cardiff, two years ago.

Newport Crown Court heard there was 200 hours of police body-worn footage from the riot sparked by the deaths of two teenagers, Kyrees Sullivan, 16, and Harvey Evans, 15, who were killed when their e-bike crashed on Snowden Road on 22 May 2023.

A police officer told jurors the footage included the two boys’ mothers being told they would not be able to see their bodies.

Fiona Haggerty-James from South Wales Police, the officer who put together much of the material, made the admission during cross-examination by one of the defendant’s lawyers.

Prosecutors described one of the defendants Lee Robinson from Caerau, Cardiff, as an “aggressive focal point” of the riot.

In police body-worn footage, Mr Robinson can be seen wearing a grey Chicago Bulls vest and repeatedly calling police officers “murderers” as well claiming “you kill dogs, you kill kids”.

In a text exchange found on Mr Robinson’s phone from the following day, he appears to tell a friend “we flipped the car and blew them up”.

Under cross examination Ms Haggerty-James accepted Robinson appeared to be focused on one of the police dog handlers and was not directing abuse at any other officers.

Harry Baker, defending Mr Robinson, also played another video from later in the evening where his client spoke “pleasantly” to an officer and asked why it was not in the prosecution’s material.

Ms Haggerty-James said the material had been compiled to “capture their offending behaviour”.

On Tuesday, the jury was told that all eight defendants “played a part in the rioting mob”.

Lee Robinson, 38, from Caerau, McKenzie Danks, 22, from Caerau, Michalea Gonzalez, 37, from Ely, Zayne Farrugia, 25, from Caerau, Jordan Bratcher, 27, from Llanishen, Jaydan Baston, 21, from Caerau, Connor O’Sullivan, 26, from Ely and Luke Williams, 31, from Caerau, deny the charge of riot.

The trial is expected to last six weeks.

Continue Reading

Business

Becker regrets winning Wimbledon at 17

Published

on

Read full article on post.

  • 49 minutes ago

Six-time Grand Slam champion Boris Becker says he regrets winning Wimbledon at the age of 17 because of the pressure it placed on him during and after his playing career.

The German was only 17 years, seven months and 15 days when he beat Kevin Curren in 1985, becoming the youngest Wimbledon men’s singles champion of all time.

Becker went on to win five more Grand Slam titles, including another two at Wimbledon, and became one of the greatest players of his generation.

However, Becker’s success was often overshadowed by a turbulent private life and repeated financial difficulties.

In 2023 he was released from prison in London after serving eight months of a two-and-a-half-year jail sentence for hiding £2.5m worth of assets and loans to avoid paying debts.

“If you remember any other wunderkind (wonderkid), they usually don’t make it to 50 because of the trials and tribulations that come after,” Becker told BBC Sport.

“Whatever you do, wherever you go, whoever you talk to, it becomes a world sensation.

“It becomes the headline of some of the most important papers of tomorrow. And you’re just trying to mature, just trying to find your feet in the world.

“When you start a second career everything is measured at this success of winning Wimbledon at 17. And that changed the road ahead tremendously.

“I’m happy to have won three, but maybe 17 was too young. I was still a child.”

‘I watched Djokovic win Wimbledon from jail’

Having retired in 1999 and then working as a TV pundit, Becker coached Novak Djokovic for three years between 2013 and 2016, helping the Serb win six of his 24 Grand Slam titles.

The 57-year-old, who has written a book about his time in prison, says he took comfort from Djokovic’s 2022 success at Wimbledon.

“I was supporting Djokovic at the time I saw him on the TV, when he was winning matches and ultimately winning the title against Nick Kyrgios,” he said.

“That was very inspirational for me and in the end very emotional for me. My brother Novak is there and I’m in one of the worst prisons in the world. So it puts life into perspective.”

Becker was deported from the UK following his release.

“I was too comfortable. I had too much money. Nobody told me ‘no’ – everything was possible. In hindsight, that’s the recipe for disaster,” he said.

“So you take accountability for your actions, which is very important because you cannot look back any more. You cannot change the past. You can only change the future because you live in today.”

Related topics

Continue Reading

Business

The Trump administration is changing Covid, childhood vaccine recommendations – here’s what it means for you

Published

on

Read more on post.

image
  • New recommendations last week from an influential vaccine panel handpicked by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. broke with long-standing U.S. precedent on Covid shots and childhood immunization.
  • The changes by the group, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, could complicate access in some states and add to public confusion around U.S. vaccine policy.
  • Still, several health experts say there are steps Americans can take to navigate the new guidance and try to secure the vaccines they or their children want or need.
A proposed vote by Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Retsef Levi is displayed during an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., Sept. 19, 2025.
Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

New recommendations last week from an influential vaccine panel handpicked by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. broke with long-standing U.S. precedent on Covid shots and childhood immunization.

The changes by the group, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, could complicate access in some states and add to public confusion around U.S. vaccine policy.

Still, several health experts say Americans can take steps to try to secure the vaccines they or their children want or need. For some patients in certain states, access and coverage may not change much at all.

During a meeting in Atlanta last week, ACIP weakened Covid shot recommendations; voted against a combination jab against measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox, or MMRV, for children under the age of 4; and indefinitely postponed a vote on whether to change its advisory around the hepatitis B vaccine administered at birth. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, whose director the Trump administration ousted in August, still needs to sign off on the recommendations. The agency typically adopts the guidance of ACIP, which issues recommendations on who should receive certain shots and which vaccines insurers must cover at no cost.

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Chair Dr. Martin Kulldorff speaks with committee members and presenters before the start of an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., Sept. 19, 2025.
Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

“They didn’t physically take the vaccines away, but they made it more confusing, they made it more bureaucratic, and by doing that, it disincentivizes people from getting vaccinated,” said Dr. Amesh Adalja, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. “It makes it harder for some people to get vaccinated. It creates more friction.” 

Two regional health alliances spanning several states are issuing broader vaccine recommendations than the federal government, and many states have signed directives that aim to preserve Covid shot access. At the same time, several major insurance plans have pledged to continue covering vaccines based on the panel’s previous guidance issued by former members.

For patients uncertain about the changes, experts recommend turning to trusted health-care providers or vetted medical groups that have issued their own vaccine recommendations

Many of the ACIP members emphasized concerns about vaccine side effects, raising doubts about shots long-proven safe and effective. That’s no surprise: Kennedy purged the committee in June and named 12 new members, many of whom have long criticized vaccines. 

The chaotic two-day meeting followed previous steps by Kennedy to limit access to vaccines, including the CDC’s decision to drop Covid shot recommendations for healthy kids and pregnant women, and the Food and Drug Administration’s limits on who can get new Covid jabs.

If you’re concerned about access to shots against Covid, MMRV and hepatitis B, here’s the latest on those vaccines and what you can do to get them.

Should I get a Covid vaccine? 

The answer should be yes if you’re at high risk of severe illness from Covid, according to health experts and major medical organizations.

Meanwhile, some experts said those at low risk should at least consider getting a Covid shot, or can make their decision based on consultation with a provider.

ACIP advised that people 6 months and up receive vaccines based on “shared clinical decision-making,” a choice made between a health-care provider and a patient or their guardian. The group also voted to emphasize that for those under 65, the Covid vaccine is most beneficial for people at high risk of severe illness from the disease.

In other words, the panel is recommending that everyone consult a health-care provider when deciding whether to receive a shot.

But some health experts said the panel should have recommended that all people at high risk of severe illness from Covid get the shot. That includes adults ages 65 and above; those under that age with at least one condition that puts them at high risk, such as cancer, obesity or chronic kidney disease; pregnant women; and children under the age of 2. 

Vaccination is paramount for those groups, as it helps prevent severe Covid and the risk of hospitalization or death due to the virus. 

“Their recommendation is treating Covid as if it’s the same for everybody irrespective of risk, and that’s the wrong way to think about it,” said Johns Hopkins’ Adalja. “Any high-risk group should always stay up to date with the vaccine.”

That view largely aligns with guidance from professional medical organizations: 

  • The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all children ages 6 months through 23 months get an updated shot, along with older children ages 2 years through 18 years in certain risk groups or who are in close contact with people at high risk. 
  • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that patients receive an updated Covid vaccine at any point during pregnancy, when planning to become pregnant, in the postpartum period or when lactating. 
  • The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends that all adults 19 years and older receive an updated shot, with a particular emphasis on those at high risk or people who have never received a Covid vaccine. 

Two regional health alliances comprised of several states – The Northeast Public Health Collaborative and the West Coast Health Alliance – have based their Covid vaccine recommendations on the guidance from those three organizations. 

Adalja said it is reasonable for a person at low risk of severe illness to rely on a conversation with a provider when determining whether to get a Covid vaccine. 

Meanwhile, Richard Dang, an associate professor of clinical pharmacy at the University of Southern California, said he recommends everyone consider getting a Covid shot regardless of their risk level. Dang is also a liaison member representing the American Pharmacists Association in the Covid vaccine work group of ACIP.

Apart from reducing the severity of illness from the virus, some data shows vaccines can help prevent some symptoms of long Covid and other complications that people develop after an infection, according to Dang. 

Healthy individuals should also think about family and others around them who may be at higher risk of severe illness, said Dr. Pamela Rockwell, a clinical professor of family medicine at the University of Michigan.

“Vaccinating yourself may potentially save another life by not potentially infecting them with a vaccine-preventable disease,” Rockwell said. 

Several medical experts have emphasized the importance of vaccines as the U.S. heads into the fall and winter, when infectious diseases, particularly respiratory viruses like Covid, spread more easily. While hospitalizations and deaths from Covid have decreased significantly from previous years, the virus is still spreading.

How is Covid shot access changing? 

Access to Covid vaccines will largely hinge on the state a patient lives in, so health experts recommend Americans check with their providers, local health departments or nearby pharmacies about how they can get a shot and whether they need to meet any new requirements. 

Adalja said the easiest way to access a shot may be to go to a doctor’s office. But the vast majority of Americans get their vaccines from pharmacies. Pharmacy rules vary by state, and not all states currently allow pharmacists to give shots outside of the CDC recommended population without a prescription. 

Access will likely be unchanged in states within the two regional health alliances. The Northeast Public Health Collaborative is made up of New Jersey, New York state, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maryland, Vermont and New York City. Meanwhile, the West Coast Health Alliance has California, Washington, Oregon and Hawaii.

In many of those states, governors had previously issued executive orders to preserve Covid vaccine access – though directives have varied. For example, in California, a new law allows pharmacists to independently prescribe and administer the shot as long as the state health department recommends it. The law also requires insurance plans to cover the vaccines the state endorses.

But as of Sept. 23, pharmacists in Florida are not allowed to provide vaccinations without a prescription from a health-care provider like a physician. 

“There are some states where the pharmacist may be skittish to give out the Covid vaccine, and that may impact access for some people,” University of Michigan’s Rockwell said.  

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Chair Dr. Martin Kulldorff speaks with committee members and presenters before the start of an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., Sept. 19, 2025.
Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

In a statement Monday, CVS said it currently offers the updated Covid vaccine to patients with an authorized prescription in the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Utah and West Virginia. CVS said it will be able to offer the Covid shot without a prescription in those states after the CDC approves ACIP’s new recommendations around the vaccine.

The company said it already offers Covid vaccines without a prescription requirement in all other states. 

In a separate statement, Walgreens said it continues to administer the shot without prescriptions in the “vast majority” of states. But the company will offer the updated Covid vaccines at locations to people ages 3 and older, no prescription required, after the CDC adopts the panel’s recommendation. 

Meanwhile, insurance coverage for Covid vaccines should largely remain the same for many children and adults. 

ACIP’s recommendation allows for coverage “through all payment mechanisms,” according to an HHS release. That includes the Vaccines for Children Program, Children’s Health Insurance Program, Medicaid, Medicare and plans through the federal health insurance marketplace established by the Affordable Care Act.

One major health insurance group last week said its member plans will cover all vaccines through 2026 based on ACIP recommendations in place as of Sept. 1 — before the changes made by the new slate of members.

Member plans of the group, America’s Health Insurance Plans, collectively provide coverage and services to more than 200 million Americans. That includes more than a dozen Blue Cross Blue Shield plans, Centene, CVS‘ Aetna, Elevance Health, Humana, Kaiser Permanente, Molina and Cigna.

But the group doesn’t cover everyone, so experts recommend that patients contact their plans about the Covid shot. For example, UnitedHealthcare, the country’s largest private health insurer, is not a member of the group.

Can my child take the MMRV vaccine? 

Sherry Andrews, right, holds 13-month-old Jaqi Herrera’s hand after administering the first MMR vaccine dose to Herrera at the City of Lubbock Health Department in Lubbock, Texas, U.S. Feb. 27, 2025. 
Annie Rice | Reuters

If you have a child under 4, it may be more difficult for them to access the combination MMRV vaccine as their first dose. Children older than 4 shouldn’t have an issue getting that vaccine.

On Thursday, ACIP voted to no longer recommend the combination MMRV shot for children under age 4. Instead, the committee said young children should receive one vaccine for chickenpox and a different shot known as MMR that inoculates against measles, mumps and rubella.

The CDC still recommends two doses of measles-containing vaccine for children, starting with the first dose at age 12 months to 15 months, and a second at age 4 years to 6 years. The agency previously recommended that children under 4 take the separate MMR shot and chickenpox vaccine or – if families and physicians have a preference – the MMRV vaccine for their first dose.

ACIP’s vote does not affect children older than 4, meaning that they can still take the MMRV shot as their second dose. 

Much of the panel’s discussion last week focused on the slightly increased risk of seizures accompanied by fever in young children who have received the first dose of the combined MMRV vaccine. 

But Dr. Dean Blumberg, chief of the division of pediatric infectious diseases at UC Davis Health, said that young children can get those so-called febrile seizures from anything that causes a fever, such as an ear infection or a cold. He called it “disappointing to restrict choices for parents” by recommending against the MMRV shot for younger kids.

More CNBC health coverage

But Blumberg also noted that the vote may not make much of a difference for some parents.

About 85% of children currently get the MMR and chickenpox vaccines separately for their first dose, according to data collected by the CDC. About 15% of kids get a single dose of the combination MMRV vaccine.

“It made no sense that they would actually need to take a vote on this because there was nothing new to say about it. The majority of people were getting the shots separately anyway,” said Johns Hopkins’ Adalja. “But when ACIP can get everybody revved up about a combination vaccine and take some kind of vote like that, it scores points with the anti-vaccine movement – even though it’s really irrelevant to the practice of medicine.” 

During a briefing on Monday, President Donald Trump suggested that the MMR vaccine should be separated into three shots, alleging that “it seems to be that when you mix them, there could be a problem.” 

The MMR shot has long been safe and effective, and is credited with saving hundreds of thousands of lives in the U.S. Vaccines that protect against just one of the three diseases are also not available in the U.S. due to widespread adoption of the combined shot. Separating the shot into three could hurt uptake, as it could require children to make multiple trips to the doctor’s office rather than one.

The U.S. has already logged the most measles cases this year since the disease was declared eliminated in the country more than two decades ago.

Can my baby take the hepatitis B shot?

The short answer is, yes.

ACIP postponed a vote on whether to delay the first dose of the hepatitis B shot from birth to at least one month for most babies born in the U.S.

The decision means that the committee’s current recommendation – that all infants receive a hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth – will stay in place until the group meets again at a later date. It’s unclear when the panel will convene again to do so.

The postponed vote will only affect the timing of the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine series. The second would still be given one to two months after birth, with a third dose between six and 18 months of age.

Delaying the so-called birth dose would change a safe and highly effective recommendation that was introduced in 1991 and is credited with virtually eliminating the disease in young kids.

“What they’re considering is ignoring history,” said UC Davis’ Blumberg. He said infants face a high risk of getting chronically infected, which can lead to severe health problems, including liver cancer and failure, and death.

Blumberg said eliminating a universal birth dose recommendation will “return us to where we were, having about 1,000 kids every year getting infected with hepatitis B during that period” of their life.

Trump on Monday advocated delaying hepatitis B vaccines until age 12. He suggested that most cases of the disease are sexually transmitted, but infants are susceptible to getting the disease from their mother during childbirth.

“They don’t understand that the fact that you vaccinate at birth is to protect the child who’s coming through the birth canal of a person who could be infected. That’s what the hepatitis B dose is about,” said Johns Hopkins’ Adalja. “The vaccine is safe in that child.”

He said some women test positive after their initial test for the virus during pregnancy or can have a false negative, making the birth dose a crucial tool for protection.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Trending