Connect with us

Business

Opinion: The idea that cars give us freedom is a myth sold by advertisers

Published

on

Read full article on post.

image

IRELAND HAS A love affairs with cars.

Car ownerships are rising. In June, new car registrations were up 63.5% compared with the same period the previous year and 3.5% year-to-date. The figures for August show the jump compared with August 2024 was smaller at just 1%, but the year-to-date increase remains steady at 3.4%.

But is car ownership making people happier? It doesn’t seem so. A US survey found that, in a typical week, relying on a car more than 50% of the time for out-of-home activities is associated with a decrease in life satisfaction

Those of a certain age will remember the advertisement for the Renault 21 – maybe more for the soundtrack than the car itself. The beat, tone and lyrics of the 1960s song “I Feel Free” by the rock band Cream not only gave a sense of freedom but also joy and elation.

It was the perfect song for what car makers have been trying to sell for generations – the sense that cars gave you freedom, independence and happiness. No wonder Renault chose the song.

The myth of freedom

Motor manufacturers have been pedalling the idea that cars signified freedom since they started making them.

“To own a Ford car is to be free to venture into new and untried places. It is to answer every challenge of Nature’s charms, safely, surely and without fatigue.” These are the first few lines from a Ford ad targeting women in 1924.

Today’s car ads show miles of open, empty road, devoid of people and other vehicles, whether they are motorised or not. The freedom to drive where, when and how you like.

But the reality is far different. Too often, drivers find themselves stuck in traffic, nose to tail with other vehicles, stressed to the verge of road rage. This isn’t the image we bombarded with in car ads. That’s because they are selling an illusion, a myth.

Not only is it an illusion, but there are also costs attached – roads are clogged, time is lost, streets blocked or hard to navigate due to parked cars, other streets and roads being used as rat runs, our air is clogged with fumes and pollution, and it is contributing to climate change and damaging our health. Exhaust fumes are emitted at street level where people breathe them directly into their lungs. And sadly, on top of this, many lives are lost in traffic accidents.

But we are constantly told that cars are the answer to our transportation problems. I’m old enough to remember when the M50 was being built – a four-lane highway that would make it easier to traverse around Dublin, take cars away from the city centre and provide ease of access.

It quickly became clogged. The toll booths were blamed for the tailbacks. They were removed but the tailbacks remained.

Advertisement

A lane on each side was added to relieve congestion, bringing it to six lanes. The congestion remained.

“Another lane will sort it” is now akin to “Is there anything to be said for saying another mass?” from the Father Ted episode when they ran out of ideas to try save Dougal from an explosives-laden milkcart. 

Other things that the ads don’t tell you – cars are an inefficient means of transport. Most new internal combustion engine cars have a maximum efficiency of 35% in petrol and 45% in diesel. This means that most of the energy in the fuel is lost as heat. Electric vehicles are generally 85% efficient. 

This is not to suggest that EVs are the panacea – a mass switch to EVs would not ease congestion. And there still would be pollution issues. Vehicle tyres have been found to be the biggest source of nanoplastic pollution in the Alps.

And that’s not to mention the energy spent in the mass production of EVs for personal use. Car production has a big environmental footprint from the various components used. And the disposal of cars at the end of life is another issue.

We keep doing the same thing – and it’s not working

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. And for decades, we have insanely been building roads for cars to ease our traffic problems. It’s not working.

Many people say they have to drive due to the lack of public transport, particularly in rural areas, and this should not be discounted in any debate on car use. But many of the reasons for this are down to policy decisions – to focus largely on private car transport on roads to the detriment of an affordable, interlinked mass transit public transport system, whether it is national bus, urban bus or rail.

Yes, there have been successes along the way in terms of Dart and Luas, but this is in one city in one part of the country. We need to think big in terms of public transport – we need the same energy, commitment and spending that led to us having a motorway system.

Unfortunately, just when we thought we were making progress, the new government’s failure to maintain the modest 2:1 spending in favour of new public transport versus new roads is a retrograde step, which will only lead to increased car use, congestion and rising emissions.

To provide alternatives for the public to make the switch from cars, we need a ratio of at least 5:1 spend on public transport, with at least 20% of that to go on active travel.

We should have choices but the freedom to choose has been taken away by a near total reliance on private transport. The freedom a car supposedly offers comes at a cost for other modes of transport – whether it is public transport, cycling or walking.

That’s if you believe a car and more tar is offering you freedom. The advertisers are trying to sell you a dream but they’re selling you a pup. And a government offering you more roads rather than reliable public transport is driving you down a cul de sac.

Ciaran Brennan is the Communications Officer at the Irish Environmental Network.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Business

The 8 at 8: Thursday

Published

on

Read full article on post.

GOOD MORNING.

Here’s all the news you need to know as you start the day. 

First Home Scheme

1. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has ruled out the expansion of the First Home Scheme to second-hand homes in this year’s Budget.

Speaking to The Journal in New York, where he is attending the United Nations High Level Week, the Taoiseach confirmed the election promise made by both Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael to extend the scheme won’t feature this year.

Budget 2026

2. Meanwhile, the ESRI has urged the Government to adopt a “tightened fiscal stance” in Budget 2026 and warned that Ireland’s finances may be as vulnerable now as they were in the lead-up to the financial crisis of 2008. 

Advertisement

Trade relations

3. Tánaiste Simon Harris will travel to Washington DC this evening ahead of a meeting US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, who has previously described Ireland as his favourite “tax scam”. 

Palestine

4. Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas will address the United Nations virtually today as the Trump administration, who barred him from attending the General Assembly in person, weighs whether to try to stop Israeli annexation of the West Bank.

Air quality

5. The Environmental Protection Agency has said that Ireland’s air quality is generally good and compliant with EU legal requirements, but it will be harder to meet stricter standards in the future.

Drone incursions

6. Drones flew over multiple airports across Denmark last night and caused one of them to close for hours, just days after a similar incident this week prompted Copenhagen airport to shut

Dallas

7. A detainee was killed and two are in critical condition following a sniper attack on a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Dallas, Texas, officials have said.

House of Guinness

8. English actor James Norton said he “worked hard” on getting his Irish – or more specifically, Dublin – accent right as he prepared to play a key member of Ireland’s most famous business.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Continue Reading

Business

Ireland’s air quality generally good but we’ll struggle to meet future EU limits, EPA says

Published

on

Read full article on post.

image

IRELAND’S AIR QUALITY is generally good and compliant with EU legal requirements but it will be harder to meet stricter standards in the future, the Environmental Protection Agency has said. 

The EPA published its air quality report for 2024 today, which showed that Ireland is projected to fall short of more stringent air quality standards that are set to come into effect in 2030 under the EU’s Ambient Air Quality Directive.

The EU directive aims to reduce deaths caused by poor air quality, which the EPA report noted does not just affect cities in Ireland, but also towns and villages. 

Advertisement

The European Environment Agency estimates that more than 1,700 premature deaths are attributable to air pollution in Ireland every year. 

The primary sources of air pollution in Ireland are solid fuel burning and traffic emissions, the EPA report said.   

“Many of us have grown up with the comfort of an open fire and limited alternatives to travelling by car—but these familiar habits contribute to poor air quality,” the EPA’s Pat Byrne said.

“Supporting people to shift towards cleaner heating and more sustainable travel isn’t about giving something up, it’s about gaining healthier air and healthier lives.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Continue Reading

Business

Government considers financial support for Jaguar Land Rover suppliers after cyber-attack

Published

on

Read more on post.

Ministers are considering stepping in to support Jaguar Land Rover’s suppliers after the car maker was forced to suspend production after a cyber-attack.

The attack at the end of August meant JLR was forced to shut down its IT networks. Its factories remain suspended until next month at the earliest.

Fears are growing that some suppliers, in particular the smaller firms who solely rely on JLR’s business, could go bust without support.

One idea being explored is the government buying the component parts the suppliers build, to keep them in business until JLR’s production lines are up and running again.

JLR would normally expect to build more than 1,000 cars a day at its three factories in Solihull and Wolverhampton in West Midlands, and Halewood in Merseyside.

However, workers were sent home following the hack – which first came to light on 1 September – with no firm return date.

An investigation is under way into the cyber attack on JLR, which is believed to be costing the company at least £50m a week in lost production.

The company confirmed this week that its factories will not resume operations until at least 1 October, with earlier reports suggesting the disruption could last into November.

Unions had called for a Covid-style furlough scheme, but ministers have ruled this out given its likely cost, sources have told the BBC.

Another option being considered is providing government-backed loans to suppliers, though this is understood to be unpopular with suppliers.

The purchase and stockpiling of car parts by the government is also an option on the table, but this would present considerable logistical challenges.

JLR’s manufacturing process relies on the right part arriving at the right place, at the right time.

However, industry experts agree doing nothing risks firms in the supply chain, which employs tens of thousands of workers, facing bankruptcy.

The firm, which is owned by India’s Tata Motors, also has large factories in Slovakia and China, as well as a smaller facility in India – which have also been affected by the shutdown.

The Business and Trade Select Committee is due to meet on Thursday afternoon to hear testimonies from businesses in JLR’s supply chain because of deep concern for some of these businesses to remain viable.

This evidence will be shared with the government afterwards.

Senior government figures are concerned about a pattern of cyber attacks on UK institutions and businesses, such as the British Library, Marks & Spencer, and the Co-op.

A group calling itself Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters has claimed responsibility for the hack on JLR, Marks & Spencer, and Co-op.

Since the attack, JLR has been receiving support from the National Cyber Security Centre and the National Crime Agency.

About 30,000 people are directly employed at the company’s plants with a further 100,000 working in the firm’s supply chain.

On Tuesday, the business secretary and industry minister visited the West Midlands for the first time since the incident to meet JLR and the firms in its supply chain.

Speaking during the visit to JLR’s roof supplier, Webasto, in Sutton Coldfield, Industry Minister Chris McDonald said it was “really important that we don’t impose solutions on businesses but that we work with them”.

The Department for Business and Trade said ministers had discussed “the impacts of the cyber incident and how JLR can work towards restarting production”.

In its most recent statement, JLR said: “Our focus remains on supporting our customers, suppliers, colleagues, and our retailers, who remain open.”

Additional reporting by Pritti Mistry

Continue Reading

Trending