The terrorism case against Kneecap rapper Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh has been thrown out following a technical error in the way the charge against him was brought.

He was charged in May after allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed organisation Hezbollah at a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, London, in November 2024.

The 27-year-old, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, denied the charge and has described it as political.

Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring told Woolwich Crown Court that the charge against Mr Ó hAnnaidh was “unlawful” and “null”.

Mr Ó hAnnaidh’s defence had argued that the charge was not brought within the six-month time limit.

In his judgement the chief magistrate outlined that permission was not given to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to consent to the prosecution until 22 May, a day after Mr Ó hAnnaidh was charged.

Outlining the reasons for his decision, the chief magistrate said: “I find that these proceedings were not instituted in the correct form, lacking the necessary DPP and AG (Attorney General) consent within the six-month statutory time limit.”

The police failed to ask the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in time to charge him.

He said the court had “no jurisdiction to try the charge”.

The court erupted into applause as the ruling was handed down.

Jude Bunting KC told the court: “This case was every bit unjustified as it was flawed”.

As Mr Ó hAnnaidh left the court, his parents hugged him and said they were “delighted” it was over.

Outside the court, Mr Ó hAnnaidh said: “This entire process was never about me.

“It was never about any threat to the public, it was never about terrorism – a word used by your government to discredit people you oppress.

“It was always about Gaza, about what happens if you dare to speak up.

“Your attempts to silence us have failed because we’re right and you’re wrong.”

Band member Móglaí Bap told BBC News NI that they are “feeling great”.

“Happy this is done, we can talk about Palestine and stop talking about Kneecap,” he said.

In a post on social media, Kneecap manager Daniel Lambert said: “We have won.

“Liam Óg is a free man. We said we would fight them and win. We did (Twice). Kneecap has NO charges OR convictions in ANY country, EVER.

“Political policing has failed. Kneecap is on the right side of history. Britain is not.”

First Minister Michelle O’Neill welcomed the ruling.

“These charges were part of a calculated attempt to silence those who stand up and speak out against the Israeli genocide in Gaza,” she posted on X.

The CPS said it was “reviewing the decision of the court carefully”.

It pointed out that the decision could be appealed against.

A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: “We are aware of the decision by the court in relation to this case.

“We will work with the CPS to understand the potential implications of this ruling for us and how that might impact on the processing of such cases in the future.”

The government has announced plans to introduce a digital ID system across the UK, with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer saying it will ensure the country’s “borders are more secure”.

The IDs will not have to be carried day-to-day, but they will be compulsory for anyone wanting to work.

The government says the scheme will be rolled-out “by the end of the Parliament” – meaning before the next general election, which by law must be held no later than August 2029.

The digital IDs will be used to prove a person’s right to live and work in the UK.

They will take the form of an app-based system, stored on smartphones in a similar way to the NHS App or digital bank cards.

Information on the holders’ residency status, name, date of birth, nationality and a photo will be included.

Announcing the scheme, Sir Keir said: “You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID. It’s as simple as that.”

The government says the scheme is designed to curb illegal immigration by making it harder for people without status to find jobs. Ministers argue this is one of the key pull factors for migrants entering the UK illegally.

Employers will no longer be able to rely on a National Insurance number – which is currently used as part of proof of right to work – or paper-based checks.

At the moment, it is quite easy to borrow, steal or use someone else’s National Insurance number and that is part of the problem in the shadow economy – people sharing National Insurance numbers for example.

The idea is you would have a picture attached which would make it – in theory – harder to abuse that system.

However, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said that while there are arguments “for and against” digital ID, making it mandatory “requires a proper national debate”.

In a post on X she said: “Can we really trust [Labour] to implement an expensive national programme that will impact all of our lives and put additional burdens on law abiding people? I doubt it.”

Liberal Democrats’ Shadow Attorney General Ben Maguire told the BBC the party was “struggling” to see how the policy would have a meaningful impact on illegal migration.

Digital ID will be available to all UK citizens and legal residents, and mandatory in order to work.

However, for students, pensioners or others not seeking work, having a digital ID will be optional.

Officials also stress it will not function like a traditional identity card: people will not be required to carry it in public.

Ministers have ruled out requiring the ID for access to healthcare or welfare payments.

However, the system is being designed to integrate with some government services, to make applications simpler and reduce fraud.

The government said that, in time, digital IDs would make it easier to apply for services such as driving licences, childcare and welfare. It said it would also simplify access to tax records.

The government has promised the system will be “inclusive” and work for those without smartphones, passports or reliable internet access.

A public consultation expected to be launched later this year will include looking at alternatives – potentially including physical documents or face-to-face support – for groups such as older people or the homeless.

The UK government has said it will “take the best aspects” of digital ID systems used elsewhere around the world, including Estonia, Australia, Denmark and India.

Each of these countries has its own unique system, but all use it as a way for people to prove who they are when accessing certain government or banking services.

• Estonia introduced its mandatory digital ID system in 2002, and people use it to access medical records, voting, banking and digital signatures. It’s primarily stored on peoples’ smartphones as a digital version of an ID card
• Australia and Denmark have digital ID apps that people can download and use to log into government and private services. Neither require citizens to have it
• India has a system through which people can obtain a unique 12-digit reference number to use as proof of residence and identity

Many other countries also use digital ID of one kind or another, including Singapore, Greece, France, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the United Arab Emirates, China, Costa Rica, South Korea and Afghanistan.

Yes. Tony Blair’s Labour government legislated for voluntary ID cards in the early 2000s.

However, the scheme was scrapped in 2011 by the Conservative-led coalition, which argued it was too costly and intrusive.

The UK has only had compulsory ID cards during wartime. Although they stayed in place for several years after World War Two, Winston Churchill’s government scrapped them in 1952 following criticism over costs and police use.

Civil liberties groups argue that even a limited digital ID could pave the way for a more intrusive system, raising concerns about privacy, data security and government overreach.

Big Brother Watch, alongside seven other organisations, has written to the prime minister urging him to abandon the plan, saying it will “push unauthorised migrants further into the shadows”.

More than 900,000 people have signed a petition against introducing digital ID cards, on the UK Parliament website. Petitions that get more than 100,000 signatures are considered for a debate in Parliament.

Other prominent critics include the former Conservative cabinet minister David Davis – who campaigned against Labour’s ID card scheme in the 2000s.

He said “no system is immune to failure” and warned governments and tech companies have repeatedly failed to protect people’s data.