The death of Chichester City FC player Billy Vigar has “completely sent the club in a spin”, say fans.

Former Arsenal academy striker Vigar sustained a “significant brain injury” during an away match at Wingate and Finchley FC last Saturday.

It is thought the injury was caused when he collided with a concrete wall, but the club has not confirmed this. The 21-year-old died on Thursday after several days in an induced coma.

James Wilson, Chichester City season ticket holder, said: “Nobody should be able to go and play the sport they love and not come home again. It’s just so, so tragic. So young, so talented.”

Floral and card tributes to the Worthing-born footballer have been left at Chichester City’s ground.

A petition calling for a ban on brick walls around football pitches has received more than 4,000 signatures.

Launched by Jack Mison, it states: “Billy’s passing is not an isolated incident—countless players at all levels have suffered serious injuries, including broken bones, concussions, and life-altering trauma, as a result of these dangerous barriers.

“These walls serve no essential sporting purpose, yet they create an undeniable and avoidable hazard.”

Michael Stemp, from Bognor Regis, says he supports the recently-launched petition.

“I think that’s very sensible, I think this is long overdue…a few years ago there was a player at Bath [Alex Fletcher] who was badly injured,” he said.

Luke Griggs, chief executive of brain injury charity Headway UK, said this “tragedy has to be the catalyst for further discussions” about how to mitigate the risk of such head injuries.

He said: “This is the second such incident in the last few years, with Alex Fletcher of Bath City experiencing career ending injuries through a similar incident…

“Lower league football or rugby clubs with small, traditional grounds cannot be expected to rebuild their stadiums overnight, but there must be more accessible, affordable ways to mitigate the risk of this kind of injury.”

Chief executive of the Professional Footballers Association, Maheta Molango, said: “When the time is right, we will offer any assistance we can as part of any investigation process, specifically information that may be helpful regarding the safety of players in grounds.”

Mr Wilson, who did not attend the game, added: “In a way I’m almost glad I wasn’t there…I can’t imagine what the players must be going through.”

Mr Stemp says he feels “very cut up” by Vigar’s death.

“It’s so sad for a youngster of only 21,” he added.

Wingate and Finchley, which has postponed its match against Canvey Island FC on Saturday, said everyone at the club is “deeply saddened” by the 21-year-old’s death.

“Our sincere condolences go out to Billy’s family, and to our friends at Chichester City FC at this incredibly difficult time,” the club posted on X.

Chichester City, whose match against Lewes on Saturday has also been postponed, posted: “Rest in peace Billy. Forever in the hearts of all at Chichester City Football Club.”

Tributes have come from many corners of the football world, including Vigar’s former clubs Arsenal, Derby County, Eastbourne Borough and Hastings United.

The government has announced plans to introduce a digital ID system across the UK, with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer saying it will ensure the country’s “borders are more secure”.

The IDs will not have to be carried day-to-day, but they will be compulsory for anyone wanting to work.

The government says the scheme will be rolled-out “by the end of the Parliament”.

The digital IDs will be used to prove a person’s right to live and work in the UK.

They will take the form of an app-based system, stored on smartphones in a similar way to the NHS App or digital bank cards.

Information on the holders’ residency status, name, date of birth, nationality and a photo will be included.

Announcing the scheme, Sir Keir said: “You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID. It’s as simple as that.”

The government says the scheme is designed to curb illegal immigration by making it harder for people without status to find jobs. Ministers argue this is one of the key pull factors for migrants entering the UK illegally.

Employers will no longer be able to rely on a National Insurance number – which is currently used as part of proof of right to work – or paper-based checks.

However, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said that while there are arguments “for and against” digital ID, making it mandatory “requires a proper national debate”.

In a post on X she said: “Can we really trust [Labour] to implement an expensive national programme that will impact all of our lives and put additional burdens on law abiding people? I doubt it.”

Liberal Democrats’ Shadow Attorney General Ben Maguire told the BBC the party was “struggling” to see how the policy would have a meaningful impact on illegal migration.

Digital ID will be available to all UK citizens and legal residents, and mandatory in order to work.

However, for students, pensioners or others not seeking work, having a digital ID will be optional.

Officials also stress it will not function like a traditional identity card: people will not be required to carry it in public.

Ministers have ruled out requiring the ID for access to healthcare or welfare payments.

However, the system is being designed to integrate with some government services, to make applications simpler and reduce fraud.

The government said that, in time, digital IDs would make it easier to apply for services such as driving licences, childcare and welfare. It said it would also simplify access to tax records.

The government has promised the system will be “inclusive” and work for those without smartphones, passports or reliable internet access.

A public consultation expected to be launched later this year will include looking at alternatives – potentially including physical documents or face-to-face support – for groups such as older people or the homeless.

The UK government has said it will “take the best aspects” of digital ID systems used elsewhere around the world, including Estonia, Australia, Denmark and India.

Each of these countries has its own unique system, but all use it as a way for people to prove who they are when accessing certain government or banking services.

• Estonia introduced its mandatory digital ID system in 2002, and people use it to access medical records, voting, banking and digital signatures. It’s primarily stored on peoples’ smartphones as a digital version of an ID card
• Australia and Denmark have digital ID apps that people can download and use to log into government and private services. Neither require citizens to have it
• India has a system through which people can obtain a unique 12-digit reference number to use as proof of residence and identity

Many other countries also use digital ID of one kind or another, including Singapore, Greece, France, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the United Arab Emirates, China, Costa Rica, South Korea and Afghanistan.

Yes. Tony Blair’s Labour government legislated for voluntary ID cards in the early 2000s.

However, the scheme was scrapped in 2011 by the Conservative-led coalition, which argued it was too costly and intrusive.

The UK has only had compulsory ID cards during wartime. Although they stayed in place for several years after World War Two, Winston Churchill’s government scrapped them in 1952 following criticism over costs and police use.

Civil liberties groups argue that even a limited digital ID could pave the way for a more intrusive system, raising concerns about privacy, data security and government overreach.

Big Brother Watch, alongside seven other organisations, has written to the prime minister urging him to abandon the plan, saying it will “push unauthorised migrants further into the shadows”.

More than 850,000 people have signed a petition against introducing digital ID cards, on the UK Parliament website. Petitions that get more than 100,000 signatures are considered for a debate in Parliament.

Other prominent critics include the former Conservative cabinet minister David Davis – who campaigned against Labour’s ID card scheme in the 2000s.

He said “no system is immune to failure” and warned governments and tech companies have repeatedly failed to protect people’s data.