Connect with us

Politics

Dubai detains Romanian mercenaries over alleged election coup plot

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

Romanian authorities confirmed to POLITICO on Wednesday that mercenary Horațiu Potra and his son Dorian Potra have been detained in Dubai.

The two, along with ultranationalist presidential candidate Călin Georgescu and a group of alleged mercenaries, face trial charged with an attempted coup late last year.

During a December 2024 police operation, Romanian officers intercepted 21 individuals, some armed with knives and guns, en route to Bucharest.

On Sept. 16, Romanian prosecutors charged Georgescu, Potra, his son and other mercenaries with orchestrating a violent coup. According to Romanian prosecutors, Potra, Georgescu and their associates had allegedly planned to hijack a protest in support of the former presidential candidate and generate violence amid the cancellation of the first round of the presidential election.

Officials stated that the armed group sought to provoke clashes and carry out “violent actions of a subversive nature,” threatening national security and the “constitutional order.”

Georgescu, a NATO skeptic, won the first round of Romania’s November presidential election — with the election subsequently canceled due to alleged irregularities and concerns over foreign interference. He was later disqualified from the May rerun amid further allegations of Russian involvement.

Romanian officials also warned that Moscow conducted extensive hybrid operations, including cyberattacks and disinformation, aimed at disrupting the 2024 election.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Urgent review ordered into asylum seeker taxi costs after BBC investigation

Published

on

Read more on post.

The home secretary has ordered an urgent review into the use and cost of taxis to transfer asylum seekers from their hotels to appointments.

The move by Shabana Mahmood follows a BBC investigation that found some migrants have to travel long distances on journeys costing hundreds of pounds.

One asylum seeker told the BBC he had taken a 250-mile journey to visit a GP, with the driver telling him the cost to the Home Office was £600.

Asylum seekers are issued with a bus pass for one return journey per week, but for any other necessary travel, such as a doctor’s appointment, taxis are called.

The BBC asked the government how much it spends on taxi travel for asylum seekers via a Freedom of Information Act request, but the Home Office said it does not keep these figures.

The File on Four investigation reported that asylum seekers must show proof of an upcoming appointment at the reception desk of their hotel, where a taxi is booked on an automated system. Public transport or walking is not presented as an option.

This can result in some unusually long journeys and others that are unusually short.

For instance, when migrants move between hotels, they sometimes keep the same NHS doctors – especially for GP referrals.

Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme he agreed that there should be an investigation into how the system works.

“I’m not surprised that this was a feature that caught people’s eye”, he said.

On Tuesday, housing minister Matthew Pennycook told the Today programme it was “questionable” that asylum seekers needed to take such long taxi journeys and said the government would “look into those cases”.

He added that asylum seekers were not “ordinary citizens just jumping on a bus”.

Shadow home secretary Chris Philp, said: “Every £600 taxi ride for migrants is money that should be paying for British patients to see their GP or for ambulances to turn up on time. This is why people feel the system is rigged against them.

“Labour are writing a blank cheque for illegal immigration while services for hard-working families are strained.”

Reform UK MP Lee Anderson said: “This is likely just the tip of the iceberg and yet another example of how the Tories and Labour have spent billions supporting migrants at the expense of our own people.”

A spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats called the taxi costs “a ridiculous waste of taxpayer money and shows exactly why the government must take the asylum crisis seriously and end hotel use”.

The report, however, highlights “the poor living conditions, profiteering and exploitation which characterise our for-profit asylum system”, Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy said.

“We are setting people up to fail while the companies providing asylum accommodation make huge profits on taxpayers’ money and asylum seekers’ misery,” she added.

The BBC went into four hotels housing asylum seekers, as part of its investigation, uncovering cramped living conditions, illegal working, and fire alarms covered with plastic bags, as residents secretly cooked meals over electric hobs in bathrooms.

The BBC found:

  • Smoke alarms covered with plastic bags as residents cooking meals used electric hobs in bathrooms
  • A 12-year-old girl living in a hotel who had spent three-quarters of her life in the asylum system. “Once we get settled in a place, then they move us,” she said
  • Some asylum seekers saying they had no choice but to work illegally for as little as £20 a day to pay off debts to people smugglers

The issue of asylum seekers in hotels has become a heated political issue attracting protests and a legal challenge by an Essex council attempting to close a hotel in its district.

The government plans to end the use of hotels for housing asylum seekers.

In August, asylum seekers told the BBC that protests outside hotels left them feeling isolated and anxious.

They emphasised that they did not choose to live in hotels and struggled in “damp and dirty” conditions.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Anger over paedophile head teacher report delay

Published

on

Read more on post.

31 minutes ago

Nicholas BourneBBC News

imagePA Media Neil Foden arriving at a previous court hearingPA Media

Delaying publication of a report into how a paedophile head teacher abused girls is “re-traumatising” people, according to a solicitor.

An inquiry following Neil Foden’s conviction was to be published on Wednesday but officials said they regretted the delay but needed to consider “legal obligations and information sharing further”.

Foden, former head of Ysgol Friars in Bangor, Gwynedd, and strategic head of Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle in Penygroes, was jailed in 2024 for 17 years for sex offences against four girls.

Katherine Yates, who represents 22 people who allege they are victims of Foden, said “people have been waiting for this report and it’s a stage almost in the healing process”.

“Disappointed is an understatement – I’m cross,” she said.

“It’s a major step where we might have had some answers to what went wrong, and what can be changed so we don’t get another situation like this in the future.”

She said her clients had “cooperated with this report”, adding: “How can it be pulled the day before? It’s just not fair.

“It’s re-traumatising people.”

The North Wales Safeguarding Board announced its delay on Tuesday.

It is one of five in Wales with a legal duty to carry out reviews in cases of abuse involving children or vulnerable adults.

And it began work on the Foden inquiry in August 2024.

It said it appreciated its decision was a “huge disappointment to all those involved not least the brave women and children who are at the heart of this review”.

“Those leading on the review continue with their responsibilities of focusing on the wellbeing of victims during this difficult time, as has been the case throughout the review cycle,” a statement said.

image

Following his conviction, a BBC Wales investigation uncovered claims Foden may have abused children for more than 40 years, with far more victims.

“People want answers, lots of people, not just the victims, the families, and members of the public,” said Ms Yates.

“And if this report can shed any light on what happened, why everything went wrong, what can be done in the future, then we need to see it.”

Gwynedd council said it also had only been made aware of the delay late on Tuesday afternoon.

“We are currently awaiting further clarification from the safeguarding board,” it added.

Related links
Continue Reading

Politics

EU concedes trade deal with Trump falls short of WTO rules

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

The European Union is coming to terms with the fact that its agreement with the United States won’t turn into a comprehensive, reciprocal trade deal that respects global trade rules. 

“This will not amount to a [free-trade agreement]. And I think if we were to go to the U.S. and say ‘could you agree with us that the objective is to transform this into a fully WTO-compatible FTA?’ I think the answer would be a resounding no,” the European Commission’s director-general for trade, Sabine Weyand, said on Wednesday.

“We have to accept that, at this stage, the agreement does not fulfill the conditions of article XXIV,” she told trade lawmakers, referring to the World Trade Organization rule that allows countries to remove tariffs on one another without granting the same benefits to others as long as they strike a full-blown trade deal. 

The agreement, brokered in July by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and U.S. President Donald Trump in Scotland, has come under fire in the EU for undermining rules-based trade and casting doubt on the bloc’s commitment to the multilateral system it has continued to champion even as Washington retreats.

In particular, critics point to the fact that the pact goes against reciprocity and nondiscrimination — two principles at the heart of the rules-based system. While the EU has agreed to eliminate all tariffs on U.S. industrial goods and on cars, it should do so under a full-blown trade accord, one that covers “substantially all trade,” to be WTO-compliant.

“I don’t want to take the easy road and say, ‘yes, we are going to transform this into an FTA’ because I don’t think that that would be credible. So we have to work with what we got here,” Weyand said, adding that this is why the EU originally proposed to remove tariffs on all industrial goods in a reciprocal way. That bid was turned down by Washington.

The EU’s top trade official also stressed that Washington’s decision to expand its 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum to a wider range of products, such as baby gear and mobile cranes, “goes against the spirit” of the deal struck between Trump and von der Leyen.

“It hollows out what we have agreed on. So that’s why we are seeking discussions there.” 

Continue Reading

Trending