Connect with us

Business

Blame game begins as Maria Steen supporters divided on why her campaign failed at last hurdle

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

WHILE CONSERVATIVE CAMPAIGNER MARIA Steen ultimately did not get on the ballot for this year’s presidential election, some of her most vocal backers have been keen to characterise her efforts as a success rather than a failure.

Senators Rónán Mullen and Sharon Keogan both told The Journal that she did far better than expectations and that that is the story people should be focusing on.

However, others who supported her have been quicker to look on the negative side and engage in a blame game.

For some, her failure was the fault of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael for “blocking” her route, while others believed she fell short due to aggressive online lobbying of Oireachtas members encouraging them to back Steen.

Another school of thought was that her campaign was hijacked by some supporters who “took over” her campaign and ultimately put would-be supporters off.

Others again felt that if she had a longer campaign, she might have just got it over the line.

Steen only really kick-started her campaign earlier this month, telling reporters outside Leinster House on 11 September that her supporters believed that the Irish people should have a choice other than an “establishment candidate”.

This week, after failing to woo any local authorities, Steen set her sights on securing the nominations of 20 Oireachtas members.

In the end, she got 18:

Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín, and his two party colleagues, TD Paul Lawless and Senator Sarah O’Reilly; Independent Ireland’s four TDs Michael Collins, Richard O’Donoghue, Michael Fitzmaurice and Ken O’Flynn; junior ministers Marian Harkin and Michael Healy-Rae; TDs Mattie McGrath, Carol Nolan, Gillian Toole, Paul Gogarty and Michael’s brother Danny Healy-Rae; Senators Joe Conway, Rónán Mullins, Sharon Keogan and Aubrey McCarthy.

Independent Ireland leader Michael Collins is of the view that Steen’s campaign was taken over by others, and that this was what led to its ultimate failure.

Speaking to The Journal, Collins said he felt the online campaign targeting undecided TDs and Senators was “the wrong approach”.

“Others took over her campaign, and that made a lot of people bitter and frustrated, and we have the consequences of that now. That’s my feeling anyway from talking to people inside here [Leinster House],” he said.

Collins refused to say who he was referring to, telling The Journal: “I’m not going to name them now, you know yourself”.

“I think if she was out there sooner and got to meet people, instead of others doing the talking for her, I think she would have done better,” he added.

Others involved in Steen’s campaign told The Journal that they agreed with Collins, that the way pressure was put on Oireachtas members online did not help her chances.

While the online campaign seemed to happen organically, Independent Senator Sharon Keoghan was one of the vocal people on social media who encouraged voters to lobby undecided TDs and Senators to nominate Steen.

One Steen supporter, who would only speak on the condition of anonymity, said Keoghan “inserted herself into the campaign and wanted to make it all about herself”.

Advertisement

“It’s pissed people off in Oireachtas circles,” the source said.

Senator Gerard Craughwell was one of the Independent Oireachtas members who was put off by the online campaign. To such an extent that he opted not to nominate any candidate.

Speaking to The Journal, Craughwell said:

“I had decided long before I was approached by Mrs Steen that I would not support her, and that was because of the online campaign that started about three weeks ago.”

He said the online messages he received from supporters of Steen became “more and more toxic as the weeks went on”.

Craughwell stressed, however, that people are entitled to lobby politicians.

Keogan firmly rejected the notion that the online pressure on Oireachtas members had any negative impact on Steen’s result.

“Gerard Craughwell would be very used to online campaigning himself, so I find it funny he would have found it too much,” the Senator told The Journal.

“Look, people are going to say why it didn’t succeed, the online campaign had nothing to do with it in my opinion,” she added.

Responding to the suggestion that her involvement in Steen’s bid to get on the ballot had a detrimental effect on her efforts, Keogan said:

“I’ve no comment to make on people who won’t speak on the record. If they have something to say, let them come to my face and say it.

“Yes, I was advocating for Maria Steen and Gareth Sheridan, they didn’t get on the ballot but they both did well. It wasn’t to be.”

Elsewhere, Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín laid the blame for Steen’s failure firmly at the feet of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael.

“It is a fact that Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and their so-called Independents pulled up the ladder to stop Maria Steen being able to challenge them in this election,” he said, referring to the Regional Independent TDs who are supporting the government.

Meanwhile, Senator Rónán Mullen, who was also heavily involved in efforts to get Steen on the ballot, shared Keogan’s view that although Steen wasn’t ultimately successful, she still did “remarkably well”.

Asked where he thinks things went wrong, Mullen did not wish to apportion blame but said “many will believe the political establishment has acted in an elitist way.”

“I think a lot of people don’t understand why people didn’t lift a finger to assist,” he said, referring to Oireachtas members who chose not to nominate Steen.

On whether Senator Michael McDowell’s decision not to back Steen was the death knell of her campaign, Mullen said: “I’m not blaming anybody. Everybody has their reasons.”

Asked if he had any ill feelings towards those who did not back Steen, or those who backed her too vocally, Mullen said:

“Why would I have ill feelings towards any politicians? Maria Steen got 18 votes that nobody thought a few weeks ago she would get. And she did it up against a political establishment that didn’t want her to succeed. That’s the story here.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Business

It’s up to Labour MPs, says Burnham on leadership bid speculation

Published

on

Read full article on post.

Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has said it’s up to Labour MPs to decide whether the party needs a change of leadership, as he faced questions about his political ambitions.

He told the BBC he had given “honest” answers to questions about Labour MPs privately urging him to challenge Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

The mayor said Labour MPs “were in touch with me” to discuss the leadership, but insisted he was not interested in a “personality contest”.

Burnham, who won a third term as Manchester mayor last May, said the Labour government needed a “proper plan for the country”, including one to beat Reform UK, and offered “to support the prime minister” in developing fresh policies.

Burnham is not an MP and would need to become one, by winning a by-election, and resign as mayor before he could even begin the process of trying to challenge Sir Keir as Labour leader.

But no by-elections have been called at the moment and there’s uncertainty over whether he would be selected as a candidate if the opportunity did arise.

Burnham answered questions about the rampant speculation over his future during a phone-in on BBC Radio Manchester on Thursday.

The appearance came after Burnham was asked about the prospect of him returning to Westminster and mounting a leadership challenge in an interview with the Daily Telegraph.

When asked if MPs had urged him to run for the top job, Burnham said: “People have contacted me throughout the summer – yeah.”

On BBC Radio Manchester, Burnham was asked whether a bid for the leadership would be the biggest gamble of his political career.

In reply, he said: “Whenever Westminster has gone into a moment I’ve somehow been drawn into it.”

He added: “People have been getting in touch with me. And obviously I’ve said to them, it’s not a matter for me.

“This is ultimately a matter for the party in Westminster to decide. I’m here to support the party in whatever way I can.”

Earlier Steve Reed, the housing secretary, said Burnham was entitled “to make his case” but pointed out he had previously promised to serve a full term as mayor.

Reed suggested Burnham had been taking “potshots” at the prime minister and dismissed discussion of the Labour Party’s leadership as “tittle tattle”.

The housing secretary said Sir Keir had “picked this party up off the floor and led us through a record general election victory”.

“Our job now is to talk to the country, not ourselves about how we’re going to change the things they care about,” Reed said.

Burnham’s critics have also pointed out Burnham, a former culture and health secretary, tried and failed twice to become Labour leader when he was an MP.

In previous leadership campaigns, Burnham lost out to Ed Miliband in 2010 and Jeremy Corbyn in 2015.

Burnham came fourth in 2010, and second in 2015, losing out by a wide margin to Corbyn, who won with almost 60% of the vote.

Burnham’s latest interview comes ahead of Labour’s autumn conference, and after Sir Keir faced pressure from some MPs following the resignation of his deputy Angela Rayner and his sacking of Peter Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the US.

There has been disquiet among Labour MPs over the government’s performance and the rise of Reform UK in national opinion polls.

The mayor also told the Telegraph that Number 10 had created a “climate of fear” among some MPs.

Setting out policies he said would “turn the country around”, Burnham called for higher council tax on expensive homes in London and the South East; £40bn of borrowing to build council houses; income tax cuts for lower earners; and a 50p rate for the highest-paid.

His comments in the Telegraph come after his interview with the New Statesman, which was seen as a pitch for a Labour leadership bid.

In that interview, he criticised the prime minister’s approach, saying there needed to be “wholesale change” to see off an “existential” threat to Labour.

Outlining his vision for the country, Burnham described his politics as “aspirational socialism”.

His main policy ideas involved more public control of housing, energy, water and rail.

One of Burnham’s most prominent policies as mayor of Greater Manchester was taking buses back into public control.

Burnham told the New Statesman he was ready to work with anybody with a “plan to turn the country around” – including the Liberal Democrats and Corbyn, who is in the proces of setting up a new left-wing party.

Labour MP Callum Anderson accused Burnham of “wishful thinking” on economic policy, for saying in his New Statesman interview the government has to “get beyond this thing of being in hock to the bond markets”.

Anderson, who is a parliamentary private secretary to the cabinet minister Liz Kendall, wrote on X: “To lead a Labour government – and a Labour Treasury – you can’t just dismiss the bond markets.

“Every pound spent on schools, hospitals and infrastructure depends on credibility with those who lend to the UK. Real change requires fiscal discipline, not wishful thinking.”

Continue Reading

Business

Government could buy car parts to protect Jaguar Land Rover suppliers

Published

on

Read full article on post.

Ministers are considering stepping in to support Jaguar Land Rover’s suppliers after the carmaker was forced to suspend production due to a cyber-attack.

The attack at the end of August meant JLR was forced to shut down its IT networks. Its factories remain suspended until next month at the earliest.

Fears are growing that some suppliers, in particular the smaller firms who solely rely on JLR’s business, could go bust without support.

One idea being explored is the government buying the component parts the suppliers build, suppliers have told the BBC they are sceptical about the success of such a scheme.

The idea behind such a move would be to keep the companies in JLR’s supply chain in business until production lines are up and running again.

“To say we’re disappointed is an understatement,” said one supplier, who did not wish to be named.

They added the government “simply don’t understand the complexity of what they’re dealing with”, and “we don’t need promises, we need help”.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves was asked during a ministerial visit on Thursday if the government planned to support firms in JLR’s supply chain.

She said the focus was on getting the business running again, and the government was going to do “everything we can to stand by the company and the wider supply chain”.

JLR, which is owned by India’s Tata Motors, normally builds about 1,000 cars a day at its three factories in Solihull and Wolverhampton in West Midlands, and Halewood in Merseyside.

However, workers were sent home following the hack – which first came to light on 1 September – with no firm return date.

About 30,000 people are directly employed at the company’s plants with about 100,000 working for firms in the supply chain. Some of these firms supply parts exclusively to JLR, while others sell components to other carmakers as well.

There are also other companies that could be indirectly affected, such as cafes near to the manufacturing plants and transport companies that work with JLR.

JLR confirmed this week that its factories will not resume operations until at least 1 October, with earlier reports suggesting the disruption could last into November.

If the government was to step in, it is believed to be the first time that a company would have received help as a result of a cyber-attack.

Unions have called for a Covid-style furlough scheme, but ministers have ruled this out given its likely cost, sources have told the BBC.

While the purchase and stockpiling of car parts by the government is an option on the table, this would present considerable logistical challenges.

JLR’s manufacturing process relies on the right part arriving at the right place, at the right time.

Another option being considered are government-backed loans to suppliers, though this is understood to be unpopular with suppliers.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, former Conservative mayor of the West Midlands, Andy Street, said the companies in JLR’s supply chain had been “very successful” and he supported offering them government-backed loans.

An investigation is under way into the attack, which is believed to be costing the company at least £50m a week in lost production.

It has been reported by industry publication The Insurer that JLR had not been able to finalise an agreement for insurance against a cyber-attack ahead of the incident. The BBC has contacted JLR for a response.

In recent years, dozens of high-profile hacks have prompted governments to take measures to help companies affected, with experts at places like the National Cyber Security Centre sent to help recovery efforts.

But the idea of supporting companies financially is something that has not been considered, as the burden is normally shouldered by the insurance industry or the companies themselves.

In the US, authorities have carried out “hack backs” against cyber-crime groups, which has led to the clawing back of millions of dollars that criminals have taken in ransoms that are then given back to victims.

JLR also has large factories in Slovakia and China, as well as a smaller facility in India, which have also been affected by the shutdown.

The Business and Trade Select Committee is due to meet on Thursday afternoon to hear testimonies from businesses in JLR’s supply chain.

This evidence will be shared with the government afterwards.

Senior government figures are concerned about a pattern of cyber-attacks on UK institutions and businesses, such as the British Library, Marks & Spencer, and the Co-op.

A group calling itself Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters has claimed responsibility for the hack on JLR, Marks & Spencer, and Co-op.

On Thursday, Co-op reported that the cyber-attack it suffered earlier this year cost it at least £206m in lost revenues.

JLR has been receiving support from the National Cyber Security Centre and the National Crime Agency.

The Department for Business and Trade said ministers had discussed “the impacts of the cyber-incident and how JLR can work towards restarting production”.

In its most recent statement, JLR said: “Our focus remains on supporting our customers, suppliers, colleagues, and our retailers, who remain open.”

Additional reporting by Pritti Mistry and Michael Sheils McNamee

Continue Reading

Business

Government could buy car parts to protect Jaguar Land Rover suppliers

Published

on

Read more on post.

Ministers are considering stepping in to support Jaguar Land Rover’s suppliers after the carmaker was forced to suspend production due to a cyber-attack.

The attack at the end of August meant JLR was forced to shut down its IT networks. Its factories remain suspended until next month at the earliest.

Fears are growing that some suppliers, in particular the smaller firms who solely rely on JLR’s business, could go bust without support.

One idea being explored is the government buying the component parts the suppliers build, suppliers have told the BBC they are sceptical about the success of such a scheme.

The idea behind such a move would be to keep the companies in JLR’s supply chain in business until production lines are up and running again.

“To say we’re disappointed is an understatement,” said one supplier, who did not wish to be named.

They added the government “simply don’t understand the complexity of what they’re dealing with”, and “we don’t need promises, we need help”.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves was asked during a ministerial visit on Thursday if the government planned to support firms in JLR’s supply chain.

She said the focus was on getting the business running again, and the government was going to do “everything we can to stand by the company and the wider supply chain”.

JLR, which is owned by India’s Tata Motors, normally builds about 1,000 cars a day at its three factories in Solihull and Wolverhampton in West Midlands, and Halewood in Merseyside.

However, workers were sent home following the hack – which first came to light on 1 September – with no firm return date.

About 30,000 people are directly employed at the company’s plants with about 100,000 working for firms in the supply chain. Some of these firms supply parts exclusively to JLR, while others sell components to other carmakers as well.

There are also other companies that could be indirectly affected, such as cafes near to the manufacturing plants and transport companies that work with JLR.

JLR confirmed this week that its factories will not resume operations until at least 1 October, with earlier reports suggesting the disruption could last into November.

If the government was to step in, it is believed to be the first time that a company would have received help as a result of a cyber-attack.

Unions have called for a Covid-style furlough scheme, but ministers have ruled this out given its likely cost, sources have told the BBC.

While the purchase and stockpiling of car parts by the government is an option on the table, this would present considerable logistical challenges.

JLR’s manufacturing process relies on the right part arriving at the right place, at the right time.

Another option being considered are government-backed loans to suppliers, though this is understood to be unpopular with suppliers.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, former Conservative mayor of the West Midlands, Andy Street, said the companies in JLR’s supply chain had been “very successful” and he supported offering them government-backed loans.

An investigation is under way into the attack, which is believed to be costing the company at least £50m a week in lost production.

It has been reported by industry publication The Insurer that JLR had not been able to finalise an agreement for insurance against a cyber-attack ahead of the incident. The BBC has contacted JLR for a response.

In recent years, dozens of high-profile hacks have prompted governments to take measures to help companies affected, with experts at places like the National Cyber Security Centre sent to help recovery efforts.

But the idea of supporting companies financially is something that has not been considered, as the burden is normally shouldered by the insurance industry or the companies themselves.

In the US, authorities have carried out “hack backs” against cyber-crime groups, which has led to the clawing back of millions of dollars that criminals have taken in ransoms that are then given back to victims.

JLR also has large factories in Slovakia and China, as well as a smaller facility in India, which have also been affected by the shutdown.

The Business and Trade Select Committee is due to meet on Thursday afternoon to hear testimonies from businesses in JLR’s supply chain.

This evidence will be shared with the government afterwards.

Senior government figures are concerned about a pattern of cyber-attacks on UK institutions and businesses, such as the British Library, Marks & Spencer, and the Co-op.

A group calling itself Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters has claimed responsibility for the hack on JLR, Marks & Spencer, and Co-op.

On Thursday, Co-op reported that the cyber-attack it suffered earlier this year cost it at least £206m in lost revenues.

JLR has been receiving support from the National Cyber Security Centre and the National Crime Agency.

The Department for Business and Trade said ministers had discussed “the impacts of the cyber-incident and how JLR can work towards restarting production”.

In its most recent statement, JLR said: “Our focus remains on supporting our customers, suppliers, colleagues, and our retailers, who remain open.”

Additional reporting by Pritti Mistry and Michael Sheils McNamee

Continue Reading

Trending