Connect with us

Business

‘Anti-ICE’ message on ammunition at Dallas shooting that killed two immigration detainees

Published

on

Read full article on post.

26 minutes ago

Ben HattonWashington DC

Two detainees have died and another is critically injured after a rooftop sniper opened fire at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) centre in Dallas, Texas, officials say.

The gunman fired indiscriminately at the ICE facility and at a nearby unmarked van, law enforcement officials say, before dying from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

No law enforcement were injured. FBI Director Kash Patel posted a photo on X of unused ammunition recovered from the scene. One casing has the phrase “ANTI-ICE” on it.

It is the latest in a string of attacks on ICE facilities in recent months as the agency ramps up efforts to deliver on US President Dobald Trump’s pledge for mass deportations.

imageKash Patel/FBI An unused ammunition clip with "ANTI-ICE" written on one of the bulletsKash Patel/FBI

“While the investigation is ongoing, an initial review of the evidence shows an ideological motive behind this attack,” Patel wrote on X.

“These despicable, politically motivated attacks against law enforcement are not a one-off.”

FBI special agent Joe Rothrock told a news conference that rounds found near the gunman contained “messages that are anti-ICE in nature”.

“This is just the most recent example of this type of attack,” he said. He said the FBI was investigating it as “an act of targeted violence”.

Dallas police said a preliminary investigation determined the suspect had opened fire from an adjacent building.

“The shooter fired indiscriminately at the ICE building, including at a van in the sallyport where the victims were shot,” the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said in a statement.

Reuters news agency reported that the building targeted is an ICE field office used for short-term processing of recently arrested detainees, and is not used as a detention facility.

Acting director of the Dallas ICE office Joshua Johnson told the news conference it was the second time he has had to stand in front of the media and talk about a gunman at one of his facilities.

“The takeaway from all of this is that the rhetoric has to stop,” he said.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz also spoke at the news conference, condemning “politically motivated violence”.

“Your political opponents are not Nazis,” he said, urging people not to demonise each other for partisan reasons. “The divisive rhetoric, tragically, has real consequences.”

image

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement: “This shooting must serve as a wake-up call to the far-left that their rhetoric about ICE has consequences.

“Comparing ICE Day-in and day-out to the Nazi Gestapo, the Secret Police, and slave patrols has consequences.”

US Vice-President JD Vance posted on X: “The obsessive attack on law enforcement, particularly ICE, must stop. I’m praying for everyone hurt in this attack and for their families.”

Republican Governor of Texas Greg Abbott said on X the shooting would “NOT slow our arrest, detention, & deportation of illegal immigrants”.

The ICE field office in Dallas has been targeted by a series of protests this summer.

A man was arrested in August after he entered the facility claiming to have a bomb in his backpack, according to the DHS.

The 36-year-old US citizen, Bratton Dean Wilkinson, had shown the building’s security staff a device on his wrist that he described as a bomb “detonator,” the DHS said.

Last month shots were fired at ICE offices in San Antonio, Texas. No injuries were reported in that incident, which ICE blamed on “political rhetoric”.

Another shooting occurred on the 4 July public holiday at an ICE facility in Alvarado, Texas, after a protest escalated into a face-off with police. An officer was shot in the neck, and survived. Eleven people have been charged over that attack.

Business

High-speed rail plan for north of England delayed again

Published

on

Read more on post.

40 minutes ago

Faisal IslamEconomics editor

imageGetty Images

Plans to extend high-speed rail across the north of England have been delayed further and will not now be announced by the prime minister at the Labour Party conference next week.

The BBC understands concerns over the long-term costs of the line earmarked between Liverpool and Manchester have pushed back the revival of Northern Powerhouse Rail.

An announcement had been expected on multiple occasions in recent months, but insiders said an extended review process of the project was under way in a bid to avoid mistakes made with HS2, which has been dogged by problems and costly delays.

A government source said it remains “fully committed to Northern Powerhouse Rail”.

“We are determined to learn from the mistakes of the past and not repeat the previous government’s failures over HS2 and the botched Network North plan,” the source added.

“That’s why we’re taking our time to get this right. We will set out our plans in the coming weeks.”

The Treasury has been approached for comment.

The idea of Northern Powerhouse Rail was first put forward by former Conservative chancellor George Osborne in 2014.

A new rail line between Liverpool and Manchester is seen a central piece of the overall Northern Powerhouse rail project, which is aimed at cutting travel times between northern cities and towns as well as boosting the UK economy outside of London.

Parts of the scheme have been downgraded and changed by various governments but Chancellor Rachel Reeves said in June she would “set out” plans to “take forward our ambitions for Northern Powerhouse Rail….in the coming weeks”.

A plan had been expected at the time of the June Spending Review, then the government’s infrastructure strategy unveiling, and then in the publication of a pipeline of key infrastructure projects, but no announcements have been made to date.

Northern mayors were reassured by indications that plans for the new rail line alongside a “Northern corridor” regeneration plan would occur before or at the Labour Party conference.

Some insiders told the BBC it had been planned as a central announcement for the Liverpool conference in Sir Keir Starmer’s speech before an intervention in the past fortnight.

Lucy Powell and Angela Rayner, who had been the project’s biggest champions in the cabinet, are no longer ministers.

The Department of Transport is understood to have proposed a specific plan to the Treasury, in order to release preparatory and development funds worth up to £1.5bn to allow for building work to begin around 2030.

But it is understood more time is being taken to process an “extended tyre kicking” of the plans to ensure that the project has been fully scoped out before pushing ahead – a HS2 mistake the government wants to avoid.

HS2 has been beset by setbacks, leading to missed deadlines and ballooning costs, and will now only run from London to Birmingham, with previous plans to go further north scrapped.

In June, the government said the opening of HS2 would be delayed beyond the target date of 2033, but it did not say when the high speed line will begin operating.

Value for money?

A particular issue is whether the Treasury believes that connecting Manchester Airport to the centre of Manchester, a part of Northern Powerhouse Rail which overlapped with part of the cancelled HS2 Phase 2, represents value for money.

It had been a key part of the project’s benefits, allowing easy access to the airport from across the north of England.

Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has previously called on the government to push ahead with the Liverpool to Manchester rail line, and has jointly proposed a route with Steve Rotheram, which includes Manchester Airport.

In response to the plans being delayed again, a source close to Burnham told the BBC: “Any more tyre kicking and there will be no tyre left.”

In August, the boss of Manchester Airport Chris Woodroofe said poor transport links across northern England were holding back its economic potential. He said Northern Powerhouse Rail would be vital to boosting investment and exports for northern businesses.

When HS2 Phase 2 was cancelled by former prime minister Rishi Sunak two years ago, £12bn of its budget was saved for this part of Northern Powerhouse Rail.

But the architect of the cancellation of HS2 Phase 2, Andrew Gilligan, recently wrote a report for the centre right think tank Policy Exchange, calling for Northern Powerhouse Rail to be scrapped.

The report was backed by Reform, whose deputy leader Richard Tice warned companies “not to bother” bidding for contracts.

Continue Reading

Business

How luxury brands are tapping into the Labubu craze

Published

on

Read more on post.

foreground of header

  • Labubu dolls have become a $27 status symbol. Now, high-end brands are testing whether fans are willing to pay luxury prices for crystal-encrusted Labubus or $2,500 bags with the ugly-cute monster.
  • While Labubu mania is new, luxury labels have capitalized on cuteness with other characters from Snoopy to Totoro.
  • Luxury industry experts told CNBC why these high-end character collaborations are here to stay.
A brown Louis Vuitton Monogram coated-canvas mini top-handle bag with tan vachetta leather rolled handles and a yellow-and-orange pumpkin motif is carried with two Labubu plush bag charms during Copenhagen Fashion Week, on August 07, 2025 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Edward Berthelot | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

Labubu dolls have emerged as a must-have accessory in luxury fashion, with celebrities like Blackpink’s Lisa pairing the toys with Louis Vuitton and Hermès bags.

The coveted blind box toys — collectible plushes that look like a rabbit-esque monster with jagged teeth — are a relatively inexpensive status symbol at $27, though they routinely sell at a premium on the resale market. Now, high-end brands are testing whether Labubu fans are willing to pay luxury price points.

In June, a collection of 14 customized Labubus dressed in designs by Carhartt and Japanese brand Sacai raised $337,500 at auction with the top lot fetching $31,250. At the recent U.S. Open, tennis champion Naomi Osaka touted crystal-encrusted Labubus that cost some $500 from A-Morir. Due to high demand, the “Lablingblings” take four to six weeks for delivery, according to the New York custom eyewear and accessories maker.

Next up, the dolls are teaming up with Parisian maison Moynat. In just over two weeks, the fashion house is releasing a collection of handbags, leather accessories and, of course, bag charms that feature Labubus and two other characters by artist Kasing Lung, the Hong Kong Dutch artist who created Labubu. Moynat’s signature monogrammed canvas totes start at $2,150 and bag charms retail for $450.

While Labubu mania is new, high-end brands from Tiffany to Loewe are increasingly featuring characters like Pikachu and Totoro to court younger and digitally savvy customers. Done right, these collaborations not only generate hype, but pay off.

Omega’s “Silver Snoopy” Speedmaster watches are coveted collectors items, with its 2015 model, originally priced at $7,350, worth nearly $38,000 on the secondary market, according to market data provider WatchCharts. Jimmy Choo’s two collections with Sailor Moon, with the most recent one released in October, quickly sold out. Some brands create their own endearing characters, like Louis Vuitton dropping a line of “Louis Bear” stuffed animal bag charms in July.

Boston Consulting Group’s Jeff Lindquist told CNBC that these collaborations have picked up in popularity in the past decade to target customers who can afford high-end items but aren’t fashion-obsessed.

“Cute is not trivial. It is strategic,” said Lindquist, managing director and partner at BCG, where he advises luxury fashion and beauty brands. “It performs incredibly well on platforms like TikTok where virality and cultural relevance are what drives the visibility and the desirability of the brands.”

Moynat’s Bertrand Le Gall said the collaboration with Lung is a way for the 176-year-old maison to stay culturally relevant and resonate with customers.

“The cute elements, even though they have this deep artistic value and this deeper design value, I think we are playing on the emotional value of of everything,” said Le Gall, the image and communication director. “This emotional value is so important when it comes to a house like ours with a very long legacy and historical background.”

‘Element of cute’

French maison Moynat has partnered with Kasing Lung, the artist behind Labubu, on a limited collection of handbags and accessories.
Courtesy of Moynat

Gen Z customers are especially looking for emotional value, according to Lindquist. Many have pulled back their spending as they have felt the effect of inflation and see less value in traditional luxury goods.

“Gen Z sees luxury less as craftmanship and artistry and status and more as mirrors to their identities and their beliefs,” he said.

Daniel Langer, professor of luxury strategy at Pepperdine University, compared the draw of characters to that of celebrities.

“The characters stand for something, and those characters also have a fan base,” he said. “There’s people who really love them.”

But to drum up hype, collaborations, like Labubu blind boxes, should tap into the thrill of the hunt, he added. In the case of the Moynat collection, it will not retail online and only sell at one Moynat boutique at a time from Oct. 11 to early 2026

“Everyone who has a Labubu can tell a personal story about how they got them,” said Langer, who described buying an authentic but reasonably priced one for his daughter as “quite an undertaking.”

Naomi Osaka of Japan poses for a photo with her Labubu after defeating Greet Minnen of Belgium in the first round on Day 3 of the US Open at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center on August 26, 2025 in New York City.
Robert Prange | Getty Images Sport | Getty Images

Capsule collections give brands the opportunity to experiment with new looks and broaden their audience, according to consultant Alexander Thiel.

“Collabs give you a license in the eye of the consumer to do something that otherwise for your brand would be unexpected and therefore opening it up to new audience,” said Thiel, who led McKinsey’s consumer packaged goods and retail business in Switzerland until September.

That said, brands run the risk of alienating their core audience, according to Thomai Serdari, marketing professor at New York University. For instance, while Loewe’s three collections with Studio Ghibli were successful, it would not have made sense for a more traditional brand to sell Totoro purses or wallets with the mouse from “Spirited Away.”

“In the case of Loewe, it made perfect sense, because they had an intentional shift from something very low-key and very traditional quiet luxury before the acquisition by LVMH,” she said. “Then within the portfolio of LVMH, they became the creative kid, the smaller brand that experiments and is playful.”

She also cautioned against trend chasing, saying a phenomenon like Labubu mania can “collapse as quickly as it was built.”

Shares of Pop Mart, the manufacturer of Labubu dolls, have sunk by roughly 21% since peaking in late August on analyst fears that the frenzy is fading. However, the stock is still up nearly 200% year to date, and some analysts are still bullish on Pop Mart’s prospects. HSBC’s Lina Yan noted that Labubu only started actively collaborating with brands like Coca-Cola in 2024.

“The supply and demand of Labubus won’t tilt 180 degrees,” Yan wrote. “We believe it is too early to call for a peak.”

It’s too soon to judge Labubu’s staying power. But Thiel said he thinks that the Labubu craze and influx of bag charms like Louis Bear indicate consumers are looking for innocent distractions from economic anxiety.

“We see that there’s a lot of anxiety and a lot of uncertainty, and not only in the parts of the socioeconomic demographic that are struggling economically, but across all levels,” he said. “I think it’s not surprising that there’s a bit of clinging to wholesomeness and that element of cute. I think it speaks to something deeper.”

Clarification: This story has been updated to reflect Jeff Lindquist’s full title.

Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

Continue Reading

Business

First migrants arrive in UK from France under ‘one in one out’ deal

Published

on

Read full article on post.

A family of three, including a small child, are the first people to arrive in the UK under the government’s “one in, one out” agreement with France.

The BBC has been told they have been given three-month visas, with no right to work and no recourse to public funding. They can, however, apply to stay in the UK.

The move follows the removal of four migrants from the UK so far under the pilot scheme.

“This is a clear message to people-smuggling gangs that illegal entry into the UK will not be tolerated,” a Home Office spokesperson said.

“We will continue to detain and remove those who arrive by small boat.”

It is the latest development in the implementation of an agreement the government hopes will deter people from making the dangerous and illegal journey over the English Channel.

There is no suggestion from either the French or British governments that the plan will, on its own, smash the cross-channel trade.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is also seeking to dismantle criminal smuggling networks behind the crossings that the Home Office say “profit from human misery”.

However, the pilot has faced criticism from political opponents and rights groups.

Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp has previously said the government’s deal with the French would be less effective than the Rwanda plan proposed by the previous Tory government, and would offer “no deterrent effect whatsoever”.

The numbers returned so far were “pathetic”, he added.

The charity Asylum Matters, meanwhile, has argued that “the only way to stop people from making dangerous journeys is to give them real safe routes to seek sanctuary”.

The “one in, one out” scheme was announced in July.

Under the treaty, France agreed to take back migrants who had travelled to the UK by small boat and had their asylum claim withdrawn or declared inadmissible.

For each person returned to France, the UK will accept someone with a case for protection as a refugee who has not attempted to cross the Channel.

While this removal has been delayed, the government has been successful in sending four others to France who had arrived in the UK on a small boat.

Last week, an Indian national was the first person to be removed from the UK, followed days later by an Eritrean man, despite a legal bid to delay his departure.

Home Office sources said an Iranian male had also been returned to France, and later the department said an Afghan national had been returned.

However, the Home Office was refused permission on Tuesday to appeal against a temporary injunction blocking another Eritrean man from being removed.

In a last-minute reprieve, the High Court in London gave him at least 14 days to make representations to support his claim that he is a victim of modern slavery.

More than 30,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats so far this year.

The total number of small boat crossings in the English Channel this year has dipped below record levels for the first time since 3 March, new government figures suggest.

In the year to 23 September, 32,188 people arrived in the UK by small boat, 148 fewer than at the same point in 2022.

French authorities say they have prevented more than 17,600 attempted crossings this year. But under maritime law, French officers say they cannot intervene once boats are in the water unless there is a threat to life.

Continue Reading

Trending