The NFL comes to Dublin: How it became the richest sports league in the world
Listen | 26:19
Read more on post.
Aer Lingus cabin crew’s trade union is calling on members to reject the offer of a 4 per cent pay boost from the airline in a vote next week, it has emerged.
About 2,000 flight attendants will begin balloting on Tuesday on the offer of a 3 per cent or €960-a-year increase, whichever is greater, from January 1st next year, followed by 1 per cent or €320, whichever is greater, from July 1st.
However, the Aer Lingus cabin crew branch committee of their trade union, Fórsa, is recommending that they vote against the offer as most members say the deal does not go far enough.
The news comes as trade union Siptu is running 10 different ballots across its members in the airline on pay increases. Willie Noone, Siptu’s divisional organiser, said on Friday that a result from those votes is due on October 9th.
A letter from the Fórsa branch committee to members shows that 90 per cent of those who took part in a poll responded that the offer was not acceptable.
[ Aer Lingus non-pilot staff to ballot on 4% pay riseOpens in new window ]
Fórsa’s members’ news bulletin reported the branch committee’s recommendation on Friday.
Union official Lisa O’Connell explained that the poll showed clearly that the proposals “did not go far enough” in closing a pay gap that emerged between cabin crew and pilots during the Covid-19 pandemic, when airline workers suffered severe pay cuts.
Listen | 26:19
According to a letter to members, Fórsa asked the company to bridge this by paying cabin crew two €1,500 tax-free vouchers, but management said it could not do this.
Ms O’Connell pointed out that pandemic pay cuts hit cabin crew hard.
“Many are still trying to recover financially as a result of those Covid-era measures, and our cabin crew members believe the deal falls short of undoing the legacy of those measures,” she said.
Cabin crew suffered a 70 per cent pay cut while pilots’ earnings fell 50 per cent.
Stemming from the pandemic, pilots were due to pay €34 million in total back to the company through pay deals.
However, following weeks of industrial action in June and July 2024, an agreement that increased pilot pay by 17.75 per cent also wrote off that debt.
That deal prompted cabin, ground and craft workers’ unions to seek a 4 per cent pay increase from the company.
However, Aer Lingus sought increased productivity in return. Talks have been taking place for several months.
Mr Noone explained that Siptu, whose members include 1,500 ground crew at the airline, is running 10 separate ballots simultaneously as the company is proposing different measures for different groups across Dublin, Cork and Shannon airports.
He confirmed that voting was continuing. Aer Lingus did not comment.
This post was originally published on this site.
A LICENCE GRANTED by the environmental watchdog for a plant located near data centres used by tech giants in west Dublin has been challenged by environmental campaigners in the courts.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the license in July for the combustion of natural gas, a fossil fuel, to power a data centre operated by Data and Power Hub Services Limited on Peamount Road, Newcastle.
According to operator Data and Power Hub Services, the installation’s total greenhouse gas emissions will account for a remarkable 8.6 % of the electricity sector’s emissions ceiling by 2030.
In its report approving the plant, the EPA accepted that while there was “no denying” the impact the project makes to the State’s emissions ceiling – but it believed that there was “insufficient justification” to halt the project due to its greenhouse gas emissions.
However, in its statement setting out its reasons for bringing the case, environmental charity Friends of the Irish Environment said it’s brought what it described as the novel challenge against the EPA’s industrial emissions licence for the facility.
The NGO is claiming that there was no clear evidence showing the project’s emissions were factored into national carbon budgets or the climate action plan.
The group further alleged that the EPA “underestimated” the emissions from the plant and is challenging the site on the grounds that the EPA is failing to meet Ireland’s climate obligations by granting the license.
It previously brought a significant 2020 challenge which saw the Supreme Court quash the then-Government’s climate plan on the grounds that it lacked the specificity required by the 2015 Climate Act. It’s seeking to use that legislation as part of its arguments in this case.
The environmental charity’s director Tony Lowes told The Journal that the EPA’s mandate is “to protect, improve and restore our environment through regulation, scientific knowledge and working with others”.
He argued it was failing to meet it’s own standards by greenlighting projects like the west Dublin facility.
According to the site’s planning documentation, it will have the capability to operate 24 hours a day but its actual operation will be non-continuous and correspond to periods of high grid demand.
It is also designed as a ‘peaking plant’ to provide electricity to the national grid during periods of high demand.
There has been growing concern over the shift from data centres to fossil fuels in Ireland, as their backup and emergency generators release huge quantities of carbon dioxide emissions – as revealed by The Journal Investigates last November.
There will 36 standby generators at the Peamount Road site.
In the judicial review lodged by Friends of the Irish Environment, it will argue that significant additional greenhouse gas emissions arising from the site will breach climate legislation.
The case is a part of a trend of environmental groups such as Friends of the Irish Environment seeking to find new legal methods to disrupt the likes of data centres and other large projects that they argue are harmful.
It comes at a time when the government has looked to ramp up infrastructure developments to meet demands from industry while also securing climate targets.
Three carbon budgets have been set leading up to 2035, with the overall aim to set Ireland on a pathway to climate neutrality by 2050.
Ireland’s energy-related emissions in 2023 – the most recent data available – were at their lowest level in over 30 years. Electricity accounted for 24% of energy emissions.
The facility, consisting of seven combustion engines, will have a total output of approximately 116 megawatts.
Around one kilometre away is Grange Castle Business Park – it’s home to data centres that power the operations for the likes of Google, Amazon and Microsoft.
Data and Power Hub Services is a part of Dublin-based data centre group Echelon. The group is involved a number of data centre projects in Ireland and the UK.
The company declined to comment when contacted. The EPA pointed The Journal to licensing database for the site in place of a comment.
Read full article on post.
Betfred Super League play-off eliminator
Leigh (18) 26
Tries: Brand, Liu, Charnley, Tuitavake Goals: O’Brien 5
Wakefield (0) 10
Tries: Myers, Scott Goal: Lino
Leigh Leopards swept aside Wakefield Trinity 26-10 in the first Super League play-off eliminator to book their semi-final place.
The hosts finished nine points ahead of Trinity in the regular season and dominated the first half as tries from Keanan Brand, Isaac Liu and Josh Charnley put them 18-0 up at the break.
Jayden Myers’ reply early in the second half gave Wakefield hope, but a Gaz O’Brien penalty and Alec Tuitavake’s score meant Cameron Scott’s super solo try was mere consolation.
The win earns Leigh a short semi-final trip to second-placed Wigan as they bid to reach their first-ever Grand Final.
More to follow.
Leigh: Hodgson; Brand, Niu, Hanley, Charnley; O’Brien, Lam; Ofahengaue, Ipape, Mulhern, Halton, Trout, Liu.
Interchanges: Hughes, Tuitavake, Davis, Dwyer.
Wakefield: Rourke; Myers, Scott, Pratt, Johnstone; Trueman, Lino; McMeeken, Hood, Faatili, Griffin, Storton, Pitts.
Interchanges: Rodwell, Nikotemo, Atoni, Smith.
Referee: Liam Moore.
Read full article on post.
Hackers holding pictures and private data of thousands of nursery children and their families to ransom say they will publish more information online unless they are paid.
Criminals calling themselves Radiant hacked the Kido nursery chain and posted profiles of 10 children online on Thursday and a further 10 on Friday.
They have also published the private data of dozens of employees including names, addresses, national insurance numbers and contact details.
Kido has not responded to the BBC’s requests for comment. But it is working with the authorities and the Met Police is investigating.
Speaking on BBC News the former head of the National Cyber Security Centre, Ciaran Martin, described the criminals’ actions as “absolutely horrible”.
But he also urged calm.
“The hackers are trying to stoke up fear and the risk of physical harm to children is extremely low,” he said.
Kido told parents the breach happened when criminals accessed their data hosted by a software service called Famly.
The software is widely used by other nurseries and childcare organisations, and it says on its website it is used by more than one million “owners, managers, practitioners and families”.
“This malicious attack represents a truly barbaric new low, with bad actors trying to expose our youngest children’s data to make a quick buck,” Famly boss Anders Laustsen told the BBC.
“We have conducted a thorough investigation of the incident and can confirm that there has been no breach of Famly’s security or infrastructure in any way and no other customers have been affected.
“We of course take data security and privacy extremely seriously.”
The criminals’ site contains a gallery of 20 children with their nursery pictures, date of births, birthplace and details – such as who they live with and contact details.
Parents have contacted the BBC concerned about the hack, with one mother receiving a threatening phone call from the criminals.
The woman, who did not want to be named, says she received a phone call from the hackers who said they would post her child’s information online unless she put pressure on Kido to pay a ransom.
The mother described the call as “threatening”.
Another parent, Stephen Gilbert, told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 that someone in his parent’s WhatsApp group also received a call.
“The revelation the children’s details could have been put on the dark web, that’s very concerning and alarming for me.”
But Sean, who has a child at the Kido nursery in Tooting, contacted BBC News to say he sympathises with the staff there.
“We’re in the digital age now where everything’s online and I think you go into this knowing that there is a risk that at some point this could happen,” he said.
“Any parents that are getting angry should probably direct their anger towards the scumbags that have actually done it.
“You only see the people that run your nursery, and all of them are great. And these poor people are the ones getting the brunt of it on the front line.”
Cyber criminals have been known to make calls to victim organisations to put pressure on them to pay ransoms.
But to call individual victims is extremely rare.
In conversations through the messaging app Signal the fluent English-speaking criminals told the BBC English is not their first language and claimed they hired people to make the calls.
It’s a sign of the callousness of the criminals but also a sign of desperation as it appears Kido is not complying.
Police advice is to never pay hacker ransoms as it encourages the criminal ecosystem.
The hackers first contacted the BBC about their breach on Monday.
After they published the first batch of children’s’ data online the BBC asked if they feel guilty about their distressing actions and the criminals said: “We do it for money, not for anything other than money.”
“I’m aware we are criminals,” they said.
“This isn’t my first time and will not be my last time.”
But they also said they would not be targeting pre-schools again as the attention has been too great.
They have since deleted their Signal account and can no longer be contacted.
Additional reporting by James Kelly and Mary Litchfield.
Life, loss, fame & family – the IFI Documentary Festival in focus
European Parliament snubs Orbán with vote to shield Italian MEP from Hungarian arrest
EU renews support for WHO’s Universal Health Coverage Partnership
Fatal, flashy and indecent – the movies of Adrian Lyne revisited
Key oceans treaty crosses threshold to come into force
Twilight at 20: the many afterlives of Stephenie Meyer’s vampires
Farewell, Sundance – how Robert Redford changed cinema forever
What is KPop Demon Hunters, and why is everyone talking about it?