Why the Burnham saga may just be the beginning of deeper challenges for Starmer’s leadership

DCM Editorial Summary: This story has been independently rewritten and summarised for DCM readers to highlight key developments relevant to the region. Original reporting by BBC, click this post to read the original article.

Getty Images

If you’ve been watching the political drama unfold around Andy Burnham, you’ll know it recently took a sharp turn. Once seen as a potential future prime minister, Burnham’s ambitions have now been halted. Just days ago, Labour leadership – with Sir Keir Starmer joining a remote committee meeting – voted to block Burnham’s return to Westminster via an upcoming Greater Manchester by-election. While the move showcased the power of No. 10, it also highlighted vulnerabilities within the party’s leadership, especially in managing internal tensions.

You might recall that Burnham started his political career deeply rooted in Westminster before reinventing himself as Mayor of Greater Manchester. His recent moves and media appearances, where he openly hinted at national ambitions, didn’t sit well with the party leadership. From interviews suggesting he had a plan for Britain to articles indicating MPs wanted him to challenge Starmer, Burnham’s intentions have been transparent. Despite clarifying that he doesn’t write media headlines, the perception remained that he was eyeing a return to frontline politics—possibly even Downing Street.

If you’re wondering why Starmer and his allies acted now, it comes down to control and optics. They believe the public is tired of political drama and would rather focus on governance than weeks of media attention surrounding a Burnham candidacy. One party insider remarked they couldn’t allow a “psychodrama” to unfold if Burnham weren’t truly seen as a team player.

From your perspective, this decision might look like Starmer shutting down rivals, especially as he’s also distanced himself from other ambitious figures like Health Secretary Wes Streeting. Critics believe these moves reflect insecurity and fear of internal competition. Whether you see it as strong leadership or control at the expense of party talent, this episode suggests Starmer’s leadership journey still has many twists ahead.