Connect with us

Business

UN set to reinstate sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme

Published

on

Read full article on post.

IRAN LOOKS SET to come under sweeping UN sanctions for the first time in a decade – barring an unexpected last-minute breakthrough – after nuclear talks with the West floundered.

The UN nuclear watchdog said that inspectors had been allowed to return to Iranian sites, but Western powers did not see enough progress to agree to a delay after a week of top-level diplomacy at the UN General Assembly.

European powers set the clock ticking a month ago for the “snapback” of the UN sanctions, accusing Iran of failing to come clean on its nuclear programme – including through countermeasures it took in response to Israeli and US bombing.

Iran has recalled its envoys in Britain, France and Germany for consultations, after the three European countries triggered the mechanism, Iranian state television said.

The sanctions are set to come into effect at 1am Irish time on Sunday (8pm on Saturday in New York).

They will set up a global ban on working with companies, people and organisations accused of developing Iran’s nuclear programme or ballistic missiles.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said there was no reason to reach a deal when, in his view, Israel and the US were seeking to use the pressure to topple the Islamic republic.

“If the goal had been to resolve concerns on the nuclear programme, we could easily do that,” Pezeshkian told reporters, as he insisted again that Iran will never pursue nuclear weapons.


The UK and US Ambassadors vote against adoption of draft resolution on Iran nuclear deal at UN Headquarters in New York. Alamy Stock Photo


Alamy Stock Photo

Pezeshkian, who met during the week with French President Emmanuel Macron, said France had proposed that Iran give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium in return for a one-month delay in the return of sanctions.

“Why would we put ourselves in such a trap and have a noose around our neck each month?” he said.

He accused the US of pressing the Europeans not to reach a compromise.

Steve Witkoff, Trump’s friend and Middle East envoy, had said that the US does not want to hurt Iran and was open to further talks.

Advertisement

But Pezeshkian charged that Witkoff lacked seriousness, saying he had backtracked on agreements during earlier talks – which abruptly stopped when Israel launched its military campaign.

No Russia enforcement

The sanctions are aimed at imposing new economic pain to pressure Iran, but it remains to be seen if all countries will enforce them.

Russian deputy ambassador Dmitry Polyansky said Friday that Moscow, a top partner of Iran, considered the reimposition of sanctions “null and void.”

Russia and China sought at the Security Council Friday to delay the reimposition of sanctions until April but failed to muster enough votes.

The US already has unilateral sanctions on Iran and has tried to force all other countries to stop buying Iranian oil, although companies from China have defied the pressure.

new-york-ny-september-26-2025-ambassador-dmitry-polyanskiy-of-russia-attends-vote-on-draft-resolution-on-iran-nuclear-deal-at-un-headquarters-in-new-york-ny-on-september-26-2025-resolution-was
Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy of Russia attends vote on draft resolution on Iran nuclear deal at UN Headquarters in New York. Alamy Stock Photo


Alamy Stock Photo

Trump imposed a “maximum pressure” campaign during his first term when he withdrew from a landmark 2015 nuclear agreement negotiated under former president Barack Obama, which had offered sanctions relief in return for drastic curbs on Iran’s nuclear programme.

The new sanctions mark a “snapback” of the UN measures that were suspended under the 2015 deal, which had been strongly supported by Britain, France and Germany after Trump’s withdrawal.

The International Crisis Group, which studies conflict resolution, said in a report that Iran seemed dismissive of the snapback as it had already learned to cope with the US sanctions.

But it noted that the snapback was not easy to reverse as it would require consensus at the Security Council.

“It is also likely to compound the malaise around an economy already struggling with high inflation, currency woes and deepening infrastructure problems,” the report said.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a defiant UN address Friday, urged no delay in the snapback and hinted that Israel was willing to again strike Iran’s nuclear programme, after the 12 days of bombing in June that Iranian authorities say killed more than 1,000 people.

Pezeshkian said that Iran would not retaliate against the sanctions by leaving the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, warning that unnamed powers were seeking a “superficial pretext to set the region ablaze.”

© AFP 2025

Business

Taoiseach wants to see HSE-funded supports extended to help people quit vaping

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

TAOISEACH MICHEÁL MARTIN has said he would like to see the HSE-funded smoking cessation service expanded to those who need help to quit vaping. 

The Journal reported this week that people who want to quit vaping are being turned away from HSE-funded ‘quit smoking’ services due to a lack of capacity and funding for a dedicated vaping service.

This is despite the rise in people who use vaping products and wish to quit presenting to the HSE stop smoking services.

“We do not have capacity to deliver stop vaping care and are not resourced to do so,” Martina Blake, head of the HSE’s Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, told Labour TD Marie Sherlock in response to a parliamentary question.

The HSE Tobacco Free Ireland Programme was set up in 2016 to support people to quit smoking, as well as protect children and “denormalise” tobacco use for the next generation.

Asked in New York if he would like to see the quit smoking supports extended to vaping, Micheál Martin replied: “I would.”

Advertisement

Martin, who was the health minister in charge when the smoking ban was introduced, went on to say that “vaping is the second coming of the tobacco industry”. 

“I often describe it as the revenge of the tobacco industry on the smoking ban,” he said. 

“I find it extraordinary that a product gets on the market without anybody having to do due diligence in respect of the what we’re now learning are very serious health impacts as a result of vaping.” 

Martin went on to state that when he met Dr Anthony Fauci last year, the former US chief medical officer quoted peer reviewed international research to him about the damage that vaping has on people. The Taoiseach said Irish medics specialising in cancer and respiratory areas have also raised concerns with him.

“I think we need to go all out on vaping,” said the Taoiseach. 

He added that a tax on vaping, as proposed in last year’s budget, will form part of Budget 2026. Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe confirmed this week that the new vape tax will kick in 1 November. 

Martin said price does matter, adding that it was particularly impactful on reducing tobacco consumption.

“Budget after budget, we increased significantly, and combined with other measures, it did result in a reduction in cigarette smoking, but vaping is a big one,” he concluded. 

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Continue Reading

Business

TV station owners reinstate Jimmy Kimmel show after ban

Published

on

Read full article on post.

16 minutes ago

Sakshi Venkatraman and

Aleks Phillips

imageGetty Images

Jimmy Kimmel Live! will now appear again across the US, after two of America’s largest local TV station owners said they would resume showing the programme.

Sinclair and Nexstar – which own dozens of stations affiliated with national broadcaster ABC – had taken the show off air for more than a week over comments Kimmel made about the recent killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk.

Both announced it would be reinstated on Friday after ABC itself brought the late-night talk show back following a brief suspension over his comments.

The decision shows the power and influence national networks and local station owners have over one another.

While networks rely on local stations airing their shows for advertising revenue, local stations count on networks producing popular shows that will draw in an audience.

Kimmel’s return show saw his audience more than quadruple – despite about a quarter of ABC stations not airing it as the Nexstar and Sinclair ban continued.

Sinclair said it had decided to reinstate the talk show after “thoughtful feedback from viewers, advertisers and community leaders”.

It wrote in a press release that its discussions with ABC and parent company Disney were “ongoing and constructive”. The media conglomerate said it had suggested measures to promote “accountability” within Disney – though none of these have yed been adopted.

Nexstar also cited positive discussions with ABC, saying it appreciated the network’s “constructive approach to addressing our concerns”. The company said it was “committed to protecting the First Amendment”.

Kimmel sparked controversy by appearing to suggest the person who fatally shot Kirk, 31, at a university campus event in Utah earlier this month as a supporter of Donald Trump.

He said the US president and his allies were “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them” and trying to “score political points from it”.

He also likened Trump’s reaction to the conservative firebrand’s murder to “how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish”.

Sinclair and Nexstar pulled the show after the Trump-appointed chair of America’s broadcast watchdog threatened to revoke ABC’s licence – prompting the network to suspend Kimmel and triggering a fierce debate about free speech.

By lifting the ban, Sinclair and Nexstar viewers in cities like Washington DC, Nashville, New Orleans and Seattle will now be able to watch Kimmel’s show again.

Kimmel returned to air on Tuesday, expressing regret about his earlier remarks while hitting out at the Trump administration in a 28-minute monologue.

“It was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man,” he said.

But he criticised “anti-American” threats to free speech, accusing the Trump administration of “mob tactics”.

“Our leader celebrates people losing their livelihoods because he can’t take a joke,” the talk show host added.

Trump was openly disappointed in Kimmel’s reinstatement.

“I can’t believe ABC Fake News gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back,” he wrote in a social media post.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

‘I went in for a Caesarean – but ended up in a coma’

Published

on

Read more on post.

41 minutes ago

Chris Waring, East Midlands

imageSupplied Amie and Reggie looking into cameraSupplied

A woman who went into hospital for a planned Caesarean section and ended up in a coma for four days has said she remains traumatised by her experience.

Amie suffered internal bleeding during the Caesarean section at Nottingham City Hospital on 26 August 2024.

But she said her deteriorating condition was not identified, and was only able to see her son Reggie for 10 minutes before going into a coma.

Her case is one of hundreds being examined as part of the largest maternity review in NHS history, and the trust at the centre of the inquiry – Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, which runs City Hospital – has apologised to Amie over her care.

The 35-year-old, from Bestwood Park in Nottingham, was originally booked in for the procedure on 15 October 2024, but that was brought forward due to her increasing blood pressure, leading to Reggie being born two months early.

She said she was told the bleeding was caused by “blunt trauma” as the bladder was pushed from the womb.

Amie said she soon felt unwell after the Caesarean section, feeling faint with low blood pressure.

In a letter, which has been seen by the BBC, medics told her this was likely due to the fact she was losing blood into the abdomen, “and we acknowledged there was an opportunity for us to have potentially identified this sooner”.

It added had consultant obstetricians and anaesthetists been involved in her care earlier, her internal bleeding may have been recognised sooner.

Eventually Amie became unresponsive after 08:00 BST the following morning and was taken into emergency surgery, in which she lost more than three litres of blood.

“All I remember is going back up on to the labour suite and my sister coming with my two other children,” she said.

“I remember eating some pizza and then I don’t remember anything after that until I came out of the coma.”

imageSupplied

Reflecting on her experience, Amie said: “It is traumatic.

“Some days I’m sat there crying, especially when I think about it, because I just think who would have looked after my kids if something had happened to me?”

She said Reggie was born with a number of health complications, including oesophageal atresia and skeletal dysplasia, meaning he will have to have both legs amputated.

Amie said: “When he had loads of scans, they said one leg was bigger than the other.

“He had to have a six-hour operation on his oesophagus because his breathing tube was connected to his feeding tube.

“He has a hernia on his hip the size of a tennis ball, a hole in his heart, no kneecaps, no tibia bone in both of his legs, club foot and a cyst on the bottom of his spine.”

She added, though, “you’d never believe” Reggie had so many health issues.

“He is such a happy baby,” Amie added.

imageSupplied Reggie wearing a blue shirt sat on a sofaSupplied

Amie’s case is one of about 2,500 being examined as part of the independent maternity review into Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust.

The review, being led by senior midwife Donna Ockenden, has been prompted by dozens of baby injuries and deaths at the trust.

It has closed to new cases, and Ms Ockenden is on track to publish a report on her findings in June 2026.

Amie said she had been told her case was one of the ones being explored, but added she had not heard anything since.

Of the trust, she added: “I just don’t trust them any more.”

In a statement, Tracy Pilcher, chief nurse at the trust, said: “We recognise the impact that this has had on Amie and her family, and accept that earlier review of her care could have resulted in complications being identified sooner. For that we are truly sorry.

“A full review of Amie’s care has already taken place, and we recognise the importance of her experience also being part of the Independent Maternity Review (IMR) led by Donna Ockenden.

“Learnings from our review and feedback from the IMR are crucial in helping us to improve our services, and we are thankful for those, like Amie, who have shared their experiences with us.”

More on this story
Related internet links
Continue Reading

Trending