Connect with us

Business

Taoiseach’s homelessness comments ‘deliberately disingenuous’, TD says

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

COMMENTING ON TODAY’S record-breaking homelessness figures, Taoiseach Micheál Martin claimed emergency accommodation offers are being turned and questioned if people who do so should be counted as homeless – a remark which has been described as a “distraction” by Labour TD Conor Sheehan.

Speaking to The Journal, Sheehan, who is Labour’s Spokesperson on Housing, said that the Taoiseach’s comments have “very little to no basis in fact”.

“He either doesn’t know what he’s talking about or he’s being deliberately disingenuous,” Sheehan said.

Rising homelessness

According to the latest figures from the Department of Housing, 11,208 adults and 5,145 children were in emergency accommodation in August – representing an increase of 295 people compared to the previous month’s figures.

Asked about the rising numbers, Taoiseach told The Journal in New York that he has heard recently that people in emergency accommodation are turning down offers of houses.

He said that Cork City Council told him that 26% of those in emergency accommodation offered houses have refused offers.

When put to him that there may be lots of reasons why an accommodation offer might be turned down, such as a child needing to be near the school they attend or a person being asked to move somewhere a long distance from their workplace, Martin questioned whether it would still count as homelessness.

Advertisement

“But if the house has been offered… those people are still on the list, still in emergency accommodation, and they’re being counted. And I question then is that homelessness,” he said.

‘Anecdotal’

Sheehan said the number of people who decline emergency accommodation is “very small”, and generally only occurs if the accommodation offer is “completely unsuitable”.

He said some offers may be far from people’s services and workplaces, or their children’s schools.

“People very rarely refuse adequate accommodation unless they have a good reason,” he added.

“The whole thing is completely anecdotal,” he said, adding that most people who refuse offers are the ‘hidden homeless’ – a cohort such as those rough sleeping who aren’t included in official statistics.

The Labour TD believes the Taoiseach is attempting to deflect from the increase in homelessness figures seen under this government.

He blamed the ending of the tenant-in-situ scheme and the decision not to implement reforms in renting laws until March as a reason for the increase in the number of people seeking emergency accommodation.

“Government have made a deliberate decision to deprioritise people in rented accommodation, who are the people most likely to end up as homeless,” he said.

With additional reporting from Christina Finn and Andrew Walsh.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Business

Reeves pushes for EU youth migration scheme ahead of Budget

Published

on

Read full article on post.

Rachel Reeves has pushed for an “ambitious” youth migration deal with the EU in a bid to improve the outlook of the public finances ahead of the autumn Budget.

The Chancellor told the Times an exchange scheme for young workers would be “good for the economy, good for growth and good for business”.

The UK agreed to work towards a “youth experience visa” with the EU in May this year but the specifics of the scheme are still being negotiated.

Reeves also called for the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) to factor the potential economic impact of such a scheme into its forecasts ahead of the Budget, which she hopes will reduce the need for spending cuts or tax rises.

The proposal has previously been criticised by the Conservatives and Reform UK, who have said it amounts to a partial return to freedom of movement, which ended when the UK left the EU.

Speaking to the Times ahead of the Labour Party’s conference in Liverpool this week, Reeves said the youth visas would be time-limited, with those aged 18 to 30 allowed to stay for two years and given no right to remain.

The chancellor declined to specify how many visas could be issued annually under the scheme.

The UK already has similar schemes with 11 countries including Australia, New Zealand and Japan, with people able to stay for up to three years depending on where they apply from.

Under those agreements, the UK issued just over 24,000 youth mobility visas in 2024.

The OBR has previously scored UK growth down by 4% due to the original Brexit deal.

The chancellor believes that has set a precedent and that the OBR should include the projected economic upsides of a youth mobility scheme into its upcoming forecast.

Referencing the agreement between London and Brussels earlier this year, Reeves told the Times: “As a result of that reset in May, we think the economy will be stronger. We also want the OBR to score that.”

The OBR will send its first economic forecast to the treasury on Friday, which will include the gap the chancellor will need to make up in her 26 November Budget.

Much is depending on the OBR’s expected downgrade to the underlying long-term performance of the economy, or productivity. The gap could be £20 or £30 billion per year.

In response, the Chancellor has stressed a series of measures aimed to help the economy grow faster, including further trade deals.

If accepted by the independent forecasters, the inclusion of the proposed EU youth mobility scheme into its calculations could theoretically limit the extent of any new tax rises.

The OBR has scored policy moves on house building and childcare as helpful to the economy in recent years.

Speculation has been rife that the chancellor will be forced to raise taxes or cut spending in order to fill the fiscal hole, despite Labour’s election promise not to increase income tax, National Insurance or VAT for working people.

Continue Reading

Business

UN sanctions against Iran to resume over banned nuclear activity

Published

on

Read full article on post.

15 minutes ago

Lyse DoucetChief international correspondent, New York and

Raffi Berg

imageEPA

The United Nations’ sweeping economic and military sanctions look set to be reimposed on Iran a decade after they were lifted in a landmark international deal over its nuclear programme.

It comes after the UK, France and Germany wrote to the UN Security Council last month, accusing Iran of failing to fulfil its commitments. That triggered a mechanism giving Iran 30 days to find a diplomatic solution to avert renewed sanctions.

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian condemned the re-imposition of international sanctions as “unfair, unjust, and illegal”.

A last-minute resolution, led by China and Russia, to delay the move by six months only received four votes in the 15-member council.

Iran stepped up banned nuclear activity after the US quit the deal in 2016. Donald Trump pulled the US out in his first term as US president, criticising the deal – the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – negotiated under his predecessor Barack Obama as flawed.

Iran barred IAEA inspectors from accessing its nuclear facilities after Israel and the US bombed several of its nuclear sites, as well as military bases, in June after negotiations held indirectly between the US and Iran to try to reach a new nuclear deal became deadlocked.

President Pezeshkian told the UN this week that his country would never seek to build a nuclear bomb.

Speaking to a group of journalists, Pezeshkian accused foreign powers of seeking a superficial pretext to set the region ablaze, insisting that, despite previous threats, Iran would not quit the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

But he added that Tehran would need reassurances that its nuclear facilities would not be attacked by Israel in order to normalise its nuclear enrichment programme.

Pezeshkian kept pointing to the negotiations which had taken place before Israel and the US bombed Iran’s nuclear sites in June and accused the Americans of not taking the talks seriously. The sanctions add yet more strain to an already fraught situation.

The sanctions would include:

  • an arms embargo
  • a ban on uranium enrichment
  • a ban on activity connected to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons
  • a freeze of assets and a travel ban on Iranian figures and entities
  • authorisation of countries to inspect Iran Air and Iran Shipping Lines cargo
imageReuters People walking through a market place in Tehran (file photo)Reuters

Unless a solution is found, UN sanctions would come into force first, followed by EU sanctions next week.

European foreign ministers had tried to avert the council’s step by urging Iran to resume negotiations with the US; to cooperate with the UN’s nuclear watchdog the IAEA, and to account for its highly enriched uranium stockpile.

Speaking at the UN on Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi said: “The United States has betrayed diplomacy, but it is the E3 (Britain, Germany and France) which have buried it.”

“The negotiation with the United States is in fact a pure dead end,” Aragchi added.

Iran is legally obliged under the nuclear treaty to allow inspections.

It has been in talks this week with the IAEA to find a way forward, but has warned that a return of sanctions will put that in jeopardy.

On Friday, the IAEA confirmed that inspections of Iranian nuclear sites had resumed this week after a hiatius following Washington and Israel’s strikes.

Western powers and the IAEA say they are not convinced that Iran’s nuclear programme has purely peaceful purposes.

Iran strongly insists it is not seeking nuclear weapons, and that its programme is solely a civilian one.

Russia on Friday signed a $25bn deal with Iran to build four nuclear power reactors in southern Iran, Iranian state-run IRNA news agency reported.

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk and Prince Andrew named in new Epstein files

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

Billionaire Elon Musk and Prince Andrew are named in new files released by Congressional Democrats that relate to the late convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein.

The files turned over to the House Oversight Committee by the Jeffrey Epstein Estate appear to show that Musk had been invited to Epstein’s island in December 2014.

Separately a manifest for a flight from New Jersey to Florida in May 2000 names Prince Andrew among the passengers.

Musk and Prince Andrew have been approached for comment.

Prince Andrew has previously strenuously denied any wrongdoing. Musk has previously been quoted as saying that Epstein had invited him to the island but he had declined.

The partial records are from the third batch of documents produced by the Jeffrey Epstein Estate. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee say they include phone message logs, copies of flight logs and manifests for aircrafts, copies of financial ledgers and Epstein’s daily schedule.

In addition to Musk and Prince Andrew, the files released publicly also contain the names of other prominent figures including internet entrepreneur Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon, a former advisor to Donald Trump

One line in the records dated 6 December 2014 reads: “Reminder: Elon Musk to island Dec. 6 (is this still happening?)”

A flight manifest records that Prince Andrew was on a flight with Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell from Teterboro, New Jersey, to West Palm Beach, Florida, on 12 May 2000. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of conspiring with Epstein to traffic girls for sex.

One heavily redacted ledger records two references of payments for massages for an ‘Andrew’ in February and May 2000. While Palace records, photographs and press reports from the time indicate Prince Andrew had travelled to the US around the time of the dates recorded in the newly released document, it is not clear who the ‘Andrew’ referred to in the ledger is.

On 11 May 2000, Buckingham Palace said on its website that Prince Andrew had flown to New York to attend a reception in New York for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Andrew returned to the UK on 15 May, a later entry said.

In the files, there is also an entry referring to a planned lunch with Peter Thiel in November 2017.

There is also an entry referring to a planned breakfast with Steve Bannon 17 February 2019.

The files also mention tentative plans for a breakfast party with Microsoft founder Bill Gates in December 2014. In 2022 Gates told the BBC that meeting Jeffrey Epstein had been a “mistake”.

It is not suggested that those mentioned in the files were aware of the alleged criminal activity for which Epstein was later arrested.

Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

In 2008, he reached a plea deal with prosecutors after the parents of a 14-year-old girl told police in Florida that Epstein had molested their daughter at his Palm Beach home.

He was arrested again in July 2019 on sex trafficking charges.

Sara Guerrero, a spokesperson for the Democrats on the committee, urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to release more files related to Epstein.

“It should be clear to every American that Jeffrey Epstein was friends with some of the most powerful and wealthiest men in the world. Every new document produced provides new information as we work to bring justice for the survivors and victims,” she said.

Republicans on the committee accused the Democrats of “putting politics over victims” and said they would release the full set of documents soon.

Continue Reading

Trending