Connect with us

Business

Sinclair, Nexstar will bring ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live’ back to owned ABC stations on Friday

Published

on

Read more on post.

image
  • Sinclair and Nexstar said Friday they would return “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” to ABC affiliate broadcast stations on Friday.
  • The companies, which together own and operate roughly 70 ABC stations, had preempted the late night show since its return to the air on Tuesday.
  • The station owners denied government influence in their decisions to preempt the show.
On Tuesday, May 13, 2025 at North Javits in New York City, an incredible roster of all-star talent will tout their connections to storytelling, Disney, and each other while showcasing their latest projects for the upcoming year.
Michael Le Brecht | Disney General Entertainment Content | Getty Images

Sinclair and Nexstar are returning “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” to ABC affiliate broadcast stations beginning Friday, the companies said in separate statements.

The announcements come three days after Disney’s ABC broadcast network returned the late night program to its air after a nearly week-long suspension. Disney had temporarily suspended the late night show following comments Kimmel made about the alleged murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk and President Donald Trump’s MAGA movement.

“Our objective throughout this process has been to ensure that programming remains accurate and engaging for the widest possible audience. We take seriously our responsibility as local broadcasters to provide programming that serves the interests of our communities, while also honoring our obligations to air national network programming,” Sinclair said in a statement on Friday.

“Over the last week, we have received thoughtful feedback from viewers, advertisers, and community leaders representing a wide range of perspectives,” Sinclair said. “We have also witnessed troubling acts of violence, including the despicable incident of a shooting at an ABC affiliate station in Sacramento. These events underscore why responsible broadcasting matters and why respectful dialogue between differing voices remains so important.”

The broadcast station owners said earlier this week they would continue to preempt Kimmel’s late night show, meaning it would be unavailable on local stations for roughly 20% of the country, while they evaluated the situation and continued discussions with Disney.

Sinclair owns roughly 40 ABC affiliate stations in the U.S., including one in in Washington, D.C. Nexstar owns about 30 in markets including Salt Lake City and New Orleans.

Kimmel addressed the situation — and the ongoing preemptions — during his returning show this week.

“We are still on the air in most of the country, except, ironically, from Washington, D.C., where we have been preempted,” Kimmel said during Tuesday’s monologue. “After almost 23 years on the air, we’re suddenly not being broadcast in 20% of the country, which is not a situation we relish.”

Sinclair said Friday it had proposed measures to “strengthen accountability, viewer feedback, and community dialogue” at ABC and its affiliates.

“While ABC and Disney have not yet adopted these measures, and Sinclair respects their right to make those decisions under our network affiliate agreements, we believe such measures could strengthen trust and accountability,” it said.

Nexstar said in a statement: “We have had discussions with executives at The Walt Disney Company and appreciate their constructive approach to addressing our concerns.”

Disney declined to comment Friday.

Kimmel’s suspension last week came shortly after Nexstar announced it would not air the program in light of the host’s comments. Sinclair soon after said it would likewise preempt the program.

Those announcements followed comments from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr that suggested ABC affiliate stations could be at risk of losing broadcast station licenses over Kimmel’s remarks, which came during a show monologue.

The series of events raised questions about influence by the Trump administration on the media and First Amendment protections.

“Our decision to preempt this program was independent of any government interaction or influence,” Sinclair said Friday. “Free speech provides broadcasters with the right to exercise judgment as to the content on their local stations. While we understand that not everyone will agree with our decisions about programming, it is simply inconsistent to champion free speech while demanding that broadcasters air specific content.”

Earlier this week, Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., sent a letter to Sinclair pushing to bring “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” back on air. Sinclair owns the Seattle ABC affiliate station.

Nexstar similarly denied any government influence.

“As a local broadcaster, Nexstar remains committed to protecting the First Amendment while producing and airing local and national news that is fact-based and unbiased and, above all, broadcasting content that is in the best interest of the communities we serve,” Nexstar said in a statement.

“We stand apart from cable television, monolithic streaming services, and national networks in our commitment – and obligation – to be stewards of the public airwaves and to protect and reflect the specific sensibilities of our communities,” the statement continued. “To be clear, our commitment to those principles has guided our decisions throughout this process, independent of any external influence from government agencies or individuals.”

Business

‘Novel’ court action launched against EPA permit for data centre group’s power plant

Published

on

This post was originally published on this site.

image

A LICENCE GRANTED by the environmental watchdog for a plant located near data centres used by tech giants in west Dublin has been challenged by environmental campaigners in the courts.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the license in July for the combustion of natural gas, a fossil fuel, to power a data centre operated by Data and Power Hub Services Limited on Peamount Road, Newcastle.

According to operator Data and Power Hub Services, the installation’s total greenhouse gas emissions will account for a remarkable 8.6 % of the electricity sector’s emissions ceiling by 2030.

In its report approving the plant, the EPA accepted that while there was “no denying” the impact the project makes to the State’s emissions ceiling – but it believed that there was “insufficient justification” to halt the project due to its greenhouse gas emissions.

However, in its statement setting out its reasons for bringing the case, environmental charity Friends of the Irish Environment said it’s brought what it described as the novel challenge against the EPA’s industrial emissions licence for the facility.

The NGO is claiming that there was no clear evidence showing the project’s emissions were factored into national carbon budgets or the climate action plan.

The group further alleged that the EPA “underestimated” the emissions from the plant and is challenging the site on the grounds that the EPA is failing to meet Ireland’s climate obligations by granting the license.

It previously brought a significant 2020 challenge which saw the Supreme Court quash the then-Government’s climate plan on the grounds that it lacked the specificity required by the 2015 Climate Act. It’s seeking to use that legislation as part of its arguments in this case.

The environmental charity’s director Tony Lowes told The Journal that the EPA’s mandate is “to protect, improve and restore our environment through regulation, scientific knowledge and working with others”.

He argued it was failing to meet it’s own standards by greenlighting projects like the west Dublin facility.

According to the site’s planning documentation, it will have the capability to operate 24 hours a day but its actual operation will be non-continuous and correspond to periods of high grid demand.

Advertisement

It is also designed as a ‘peaking plant’ to provide electricity to the national grid during periods of high demand.

There has been growing concern over the shift from data centres to fossil fuels in Ireland, as their backup and emergency generators release huge quantities of carbon dioxide emissions – as revealed by The Journal Investigates last November.

There will 36 standby generators at the Peamount Road site.

In the judicial review lodged by Friends of the Irish Environment, it will argue that significant additional greenhouse gas emissions arising from the site will breach climate legislation.

Government climate and infrastructure targets

The case is a part of a trend of environmental groups such as Friends of the Irish Environment seeking to find new legal methods to disrupt the likes of data centres and other large projects that they argue are harmful.

It comes at a time when the government has looked to ramp up infrastructure developments to meet demands from industry while also securing climate targets.

Three carbon budgets have been set leading up to 2035, with the overall aim to set Ireland on a pathway to climate neutrality by 2050.

Ireland’s energy-related emissions in 2023 – the most recent data available – were at their lowest level in over 30 years. Electricity accounted for 24% of energy emissions.

The facility, consisting of seven combustion engines, will have a total output of approximately 116 megawatts.

Around one kilometre away is Grange Castle Business Park – it’s home to data centres that power the operations for the likes of Google, Amazon and Microsoft.

Data and Power Hub Services is a part of Dublin-based data centre group Echelon. The group is involved a number of data centre projects in Ireland and the UK.

The company declined to comment when contacted. The EPA pointed The Journal to licensing database for the site in place of a comment.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone…
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Continue Reading

Business

Leigh ease past Wakefield to reach semi-finals

Published

on

Read full article on post.

Betfred Super League play-off eliminator

Leigh (18) 26

Tries: Brand, Liu, Charnley, Tuitavake Goals: O’Brien 5

Wakefield (0) 10

Tries: Myers, Scott Goal: Lino

Leigh Leopards swept aside Wakefield Trinity 26-10 in the first Super League play-off eliminator to book their semi-final place.

The hosts finished nine points ahead of Trinity in the regular season and dominated the first half as tries from Keanan Brand, Isaac Liu and Josh Charnley put them 18-0 up at the break.

Jayden Myers’ reply early in the second half gave Wakefield hope, but a Gaz O’Brien penalty and Alec Tuitavake’s score meant Cameron Scott’s super solo try was mere consolation.

The win earns Leigh a short semi-final trip to second-placed Wigan as they bid to reach their first-ever Grand Final.

More to follow.

Leigh: Hodgson; Brand, Niu, Hanley, Charnley; O’Brien, Lam; Ofahengaue, Ipape, Mulhern, Halton, Trout, Liu.

Interchanges: Hughes, Tuitavake, Davis, Dwyer.

Wakefield: Rourke; Myers, Scott, Pratt, Johnstone; Trueman, Lino; McMeeken, Hood, Faatili, Griffin, Storton, Pitts.

Interchanges: Rodwell, Nikotemo, Atoni, Smith.

Referee: Liam Moore.

Continue Reading

Business

Nursery hackers threaten to publish more children’s profiles online

Published

on

Read full article on post.

Hackers holding pictures and private data of thousands of nursery children and their families to ransom say they will publish more information online unless they are paid.

Criminals calling themselves Radiant hacked the Kido nursery chain and posted profiles of 10 children online on Thursday and a further 10 on Friday.

They have also published the private data of dozens of employees including names, addresses, national insurance numbers and contact details.

Kido has not responded to the BBC’s requests for comment. But it is working with the authorities and the Met Police is investigating.

Speaking on BBC News the former head of the National Cyber Security Centre, Ciaran Martin, described the criminals’ actions as “absolutely horrible”.

But he also urged calm.

“The hackers are trying to stoke up fear and the risk of physical harm to children is extremely low,” he said.

Kido told parents the breach happened when criminals accessed their data hosted by a software service called Famly.

The software is widely used by other nurseries and childcare organisations, and it says on its website it is used by more than one million “owners, managers, practitioners and families”.

“This malicious attack represents a truly barbaric new low, with bad actors trying to expose our youngest children’s data to make a quick buck,” Famly boss Anders Laustsen told the BBC.

“We have conducted a thorough investigation of the incident and can confirm that there has been no breach of Famly’s security or infrastructure in any way and no other customers have been affected.

“We of course take data security and privacy extremely seriously.”

The criminals’ site contains a gallery of 20 children with their nursery pictures, date of births, birthplace and details – such as who they live with and contact details.

Parents have contacted the BBC concerned about the hack, with one mother receiving a threatening phone call from the criminals.

The woman, who did not want to be named, says she received a phone call from the hackers who said they would post her child’s information online unless she put pressure on Kido to pay a ransom.

The mother described the call as “threatening”.

Another parent, Stephen Gilbert, told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 that someone in his parent’s WhatsApp group also received a call.

“The revelation the children’s details could have been put on the dark web, that’s very concerning and alarming for me.”

But Sean, who has a child at the Kido nursery in Tooting, contacted BBC News to say he sympathises with the staff there.

“We’re in the digital age now where everything’s online and I think you go into this knowing that there is a risk that at some point this could happen,” he said.

“Any parents that are getting angry should probably direct their anger towards the scumbags that have actually done it.

“You only see the people that run your nursery, and all of them are great. And these poor people are the ones getting the brunt of it on the front line.”

Cyber criminals have been known to make calls to victim organisations to put pressure on them to pay ransoms.

But to call individual victims is extremely rare.

In conversations through the messaging app Signal the fluent English-speaking criminals told the BBC English is not their first language and claimed they hired people to make the calls.

It’s a sign of the callousness of the criminals but also a sign of desperation as it appears Kido is not complying.

Police advice is to never pay hacker ransoms as it encourages the criminal ecosystem.

The hackers first contacted the BBC about their breach on Monday.

After they published the first batch of children’s’ data online the BBC asked if they feel guilty about their distressing actions and the criminals said: “We do it for money, not for anything other than money.”

“I’m aware we are criminals,” they said.

“This isn’t my first time and will not be my last time.”

But they also said they would not be targeting pre-schools again as the attention has been too great.

They have since deleted their Signal account and can no longer be contacted.

Additional reporting by James Kelly and Mary Litchfield.

Continue Reading

Trending